|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:43 PM Original message |
Wow, looks like NOW is actually siding with Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. That was pretty stupid of them. I don't think that will "up" their donations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. NOW isn't siding with Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. NOW is helping Palin with free press, free interviews and gives her a fundraising issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. So .... they shouldn't raise the issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Raise the issue consistently and perhaps NOW would get my respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I agree that they should consistently raise this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. I agree, ZulchZulu... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. If NOW is siding with Palin, they sure as shit aren't siding with women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. So NOW should just defend women you agree with? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. They're siding with *A* woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. If NOW wanted to focus on substantive issues, they wouldn't have touched this with a ten ft pole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Clearly you don't find this a substantive issue: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. When Dave starts denying women their civil rights, call me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 11:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
25. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wrote about this last week... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. If true, NOW just jumped the shark... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well, let's see if the donations from the Sarahmaniacs will make up for the ones they will lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
14. No more donations to NOW from me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. This was posted here THREE OR FOUR DAYS AGO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. zzzzzzz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. As they should. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dave From Canada (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
21. I think it's disappointing that you're disappointed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-15-09 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
22. NOW jumped the shark long ago. Defending this anti-feminist women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. that's what they are supposed to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. "NOW is about lifting ALL women up, not just leftist, feminist, or pro-choice women." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. it makes perfect sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. By your own logic, Palin is not just another woman so in supporting her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. no, that's not my own logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. LOL! David Letterman violated ZERO of Palin's civil rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. again, with the strawmen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BolivarianHero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
24. NOW is to defend feminists, not feminazis... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-16-09 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. Remember that SEINFELD episode where Elaine sneezed into the pasta primavera? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC