Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL. According to the mortgage consultant I spoke to, I can afford a $2024/mo mortgage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:00 PM
Original message
LOL. According to the mortgage consultant I spoke to, I can afford a $2024/mo mortgage
When putting 3.5% down with an FHA loan.

Just to be clear, $2024/mo would be OVER 50% OF MY NET MONTHLY INCOME!!! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep-- for as long as the bank could mine your income for profit...
...until you're exhausted and broke. Such a deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even now?
After the mortgage crisis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That was what they told me LAST WEEK
And when I told my mom this story (since she is also looking to buy a house), she told me that her bank tried to sell her an ARM with a balloon payment after 5 years just this month!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think many mortgage consultants took a special "Finance in a Vacuum" course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know, they aren't making any more land.

It's a new paradigm, and everybody who doesn't buy real estate now will be priced out of the market forever. Anybody who does buy will be rewarded with a lifetime of riches, as their property will continue its 30% yearly price increase.

Renters, and anybody born in a future generation, will not be able to afford a $10,000,000 starter home in 15 years. They will live in tent cities and Hondas.

This asset bubble is different from all of the others in human history -- it will never slow down or pop. The gains are permanent.


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. This seems reasonable
The HUD affordability guidlines are 30% of gross income. If your net is 4k/month, then your gross is likely 6k/mo. Therefore, a mortgage of 2k/mo is 30% of your gross. I've spent 30% of my gross on rent. It's difficult but not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's because they look at gross income, not net
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 12:28 PM by question everything
supposedly your net can increase once you own a house and you can deduct interest and property taxes, thus reducing your tax liability.

And, if you do get the house and/or the mortgage, you will change your deductions - if you are en employee - so you don't loan the government several thousands of dollars that will be paid back next April.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's about what I made and paid when I bought and I didn't have any problem
One of my biweekly paychecks pays the mortgage, the other goes for everything else. :shrug:

With the tax write offs for interest, it was better on a monthly basis than renting and on the upside, it hasn't gone up in price and I haven't had to move in 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. We very clearly specified up front we wanted $1000 or less a month
Mortgage PLUS taxes and mortgage insurance.

I would be willing to bet that number you got quoted is for mortgage only. A house that costs that much would have a shit-ton more per month taxes added on to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't worry...they'll also give you a second designed to suck out any equity you accrue.
Aren't we all so lucky the banks are on top of stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Remember the days when you could forget about it if you couldn't
put 20% down? And the mortgage (or rent) was not supposed to exceed 30% of your income? (I can even remember when the rule of thumb was 25%)

3.5% is just irresponsible. And allowing someone into a mortgage that will eat up 50% of income only sets people up for trouble. What happens when your income changes or disappears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. 3.5% is an FHA-backed loan, not a bank special (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. That wouldn't be unusual for PITI in California.
Edited on Wed Jun-17-09 01:40 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: ... if you could find a house that inexpensive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. It is. If you don't mind a rice & beans diet and putting off an operation for 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Feds need the housing bubble to reinflate

and are working their butts off in order to make sure you fall for it again.

Banksters need their fees and bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC