Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media chased John Edwards mistress from one side of the country to the other

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:03 PM
Original message
The media chased John Edwards mistress from one side of the country to the other
When do we get to hear from Ensign's mistress and her husband?

Where is the media on this one?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe David Letterman needs to tell a joke about them? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where's the media on Norm Coleman?
Evidently he's an octopus around women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ensign isn't a presidential candidate having an affair during the campaign.
The story isn't half as juicy as the Edwards affair was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. also if I read correctly, Ensign and his wife were separated when the affair
happened. Plus... the cancer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. So what
He was and is still married to his wife and further Cindy and Douglas Hampton were not separated.
You either believe the family values 'sanctity of marriage' BS or you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He was so running for president. He just hadn't actually declared yet.
He's been the Repuke's golden boy for a while now.

The fact that he's practically the Senate's biggest bible beater, given that he's Pentacostal and vocally anti-gay, makes this really juicy.

I want to ask him a question up close and personal, though: Hey Johnnie, which happily-married gay couple in CA personally threatened and ruined your marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's juicy to us, but that's about it.
Had he announced already the press would probably care more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. and no baby angle either
that made the edwards affair different than most
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. and no wife with terminal cancer either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not defening Ensign, but I don't remember the media, as in the press, chasing Hunter
from one side of the country to the other.

Maybe the paparazzi and the tabloids, don't think any other entity could be included on that list.

And the Ensign affair lacks what those people are selling.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't know, but my guess is because 99.6%
of the citizens of the United State have no friggin' clue who Sen. John Ensign is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. it was Hunter tipping off the Enquirer , she wasn't being chased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent observation. One that should be posed to that famous "liberal" press.
As always, the double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Edwards denied it. Ensign copped to it. Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Still chasing JE, for many reasons. The extortion aspect of new scandal gives it legs
As soon as news of this affair was breaking, the first words I heard from Lawrence O'Donnel was about John Edwards. I expect that the extortion angle will keep this one in the news.

It took a while before most of the media was willing to report the story -- most until after the Iowa primary. Lot's of people in the press probably knew a lot, maybe starting with Ann Louise Bardach who is a columnist at Slate, HuffingtonPost, etc. and writes for Vanity Fair, New Yorker, and such -- Rielle Hunter stayed with her for two years after Hunter's divorce. I feel certain that the Obama and Clinton campaings knew almost as soon as the affair began.

Slightly off-topic: While doing a lot of research on "news" -- how and why it spreads, or doesn't, and about the new gatekeepers -- I found a number of really "curious" things that some of you might know more about.

1. Any truth to the story that the idea of the webisodes was first presented to the Edwards campaign by producer Cary Woods at dinner in DC and led to the Hunter/Edwards meeting? Or just a weird cover story? Was Woods an Edwards supporter and, if so, why would he suggest having Hunter anywhere near Edwards?

BTW Dangerous dining in DC with Woods; he had dined with Theresa Duncan and Jeremy Blake, the couple who claimed that the Scientologists were stalking them, just before they each commited suicide. Woods is in the middle of lots of things.

2. Who in the Edwards campaign was vetting staff, vendors, and donors? Even the most trivial background check on Hunter would have found her previous name, Lisa Druck, and a quick search would have revealed "Allison Poole", the party girl background, her father hiring a mob hit on her horse for insurance, her father-in-law was the DA in the JonBennet Ramsay case, and a lot more that should have scared anyone. Even without an actual affair, just having her around Edwards (and documented with video!) and then someone start reporting details of her past would have caused a lot of damage.

I knew who she was immediately when it was revealed that Hunter was Druck (thinking "Not her!"), and I could not believe that Edwards and those on his campaign could be this naive, careless, and self-destructive.

3. Who was threatening Edwards with exposure when he withdrew from the race? What made him do the quick endorsement of Obama? Was the timing of the exposure of the affair before the convention (eliminating a speech pushing populist issues, particularly health care) more than chance?

Just tie up a few loose ends here and I should have enough of a script outline to pitch it to Oliver Stone. :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUnspeakable Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. very interesting post-
i just know there's more to this than meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC