Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stonewall Democrats pull out of DNC gay fundraiser. DNC withholding financial support, and DOMA.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:36 PM
Original message
Stonewall Democrats pull out of DNC gay fundraiser. DNC withholding financial support, and DOMA.
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 05:55 PM by JeffreyWilliamson
Links here and here.


Apparently the DNC has decided to withhold funding from the Stonewall Dems while asking them to help raise money for the party:

(W)e are incredibly disappointed that the DNC has made a decision to withhold any financial support to National Stonewall Democrats this year but is in turn asking us to help raise money for the DNC in a difficult financial environment. The DNC has historically supported National Stonewall through sponsorship of the annual Capitol Champions event. This year, we did not receive any support. The DNC has traditionally provided materials for the many Pride parades and festivals around the country to help educate the LGBT community about why the Democratic Party is the Party for full LGBT equality. This year we were informed that we would not be receiving any materials or support for producing materials for the various nationwide Pride activities. These decisions were very disappointing.

We'd be remiss to also not mention that the recent legal brief of the Obama Administration defending DOMA is incredibly hurtful. The members of the Board and our membership put our hopes, our dollars and our time into ensuring the election of Barack Obama because we believed that he supported us. To now have his Administration refer to our relationships in the same terms used by our long time enemies such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson hurts on so many levels. To have our committed and loving relationships referred to as the moral equivalent of incest and pedophilia is not something that any of us ever expected from this Administration considering how hard we worked to be seen and respected. For that reason alone, advocating for attendance at a fundraiser to support the Administration and the DNC, while they have not condemned this hurtful language, is not something our membership will receive positively.


The eyebrow raiser for me is the first paragragh, not the second. Withholding financial support but asking to help raise money for the party? This stuff is just killing me at this point.

Have we really just been an ATM? I don't even know what to think at this point...

(Edited to highlight an interesting sentence in the first paragraph, as well as to correct punctuation, and to clarify the title.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. This withdrawal of support while wanting our money is not new.
It started with Howard Dean and his evangelical CEO of the DNC - Leah Daughtrey.

When I see Dean on my tv talking about what Obama needs to do for the community I just snort. Dean is a hypocrite on this issue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, I remember that mess.
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 05:49 PM by JeffreyWilliamson
I always tried to remind myself that he signed for Civil Unions, but even that was forced upon him.

The events of this past week have been seriously disheartening. I started out last Friday posting in some of the threads regarding the DOMA motion by the DOJ but seeing some of the responses and justifications for it all drained me of any interest in debating it. It's like being kicked when you're down.

I suspect we aren't going to get our fierce advocate. I am beginning to lose hope that at (as of last month) age 34, I'll ever see a validation of my rights while I'm still young.

I've been interested in politics since I was in high school. It's one of the few things I'm truly passionate about, but that's falling away. I don't know how much longer I can bring myself to care anymore.

I'm getting very tired of waiting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Regarding waiting... What are your options?
Try being in your mid-60s. My political activism for our community started in the 70s. My job and my partner's jobs were threatened. My partner (who had a high profile academic position) was the subject of a state investigation in the 80s. Thank God for tenure. Our house was vandalized. We even received physical threats from other members (only men) of our community because some thought our "outness" might somehow wash over on them and "people would know" and they would lose their jobs. Note: We lived in a university town in the lower midwest.

I knew from day one that Obama did not care about us - that we made him uncomfortable. What he has done is not a surprise. The moment he was nominated I added 8 years to the time we would be required to wander in the darkness.

Like you - I have been a political junkie all of my life. It started while in elementary school and the civil rights movement. That is why Obama's treatment is particularly galling to activists of a certain age and background.

Stay in the game - its truly your only option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are correct, there really isn't any other option other than to stay in the game...
I guess I just fell for the whole hope and optimism thing. I saw McClurkin and didn't bat an eye. I figured he was just trying to lure in the religious crowd. I saw the Warren thing, got a little uncomfortable, but wrote it off as an attempt to woo over centrist Republicans.

Then the discharges continued. Then the website was edited. Then the silence and Gibb's non-answers. Then the DOMA filing. Now the memo. And about that memo--the one that's supposed to remind me that this administration cares so very much about me and people like me, while doing absolutely nothing to help me or anyone I know...

My god, he had a press pool in the room. He could have said anything in the world about all of this. He could have denounced the language of the DOMA filing, he could have strongly advocated for us. I watched the video. They couldn't even bring any energy with them into the room. It was like they all wanted to be somewhere else.

I'm sick to my stomach. I fell for it all starting with the primaries all the way up through the inauguration. I'm smarter than this. I should have known better, and I should have known that nothing would change. Another life lesson, I guess.

I want to comment on our age differences and the much longer time that you've waited for change as compared to me. I really, sincerely hope my complaining about waiting in no way belittled your time waiting. And I want you to know, that even though I haven't talked with you before, I am grateful for all the work you've done and am sadenned by all the time you've been forced to wait. If it weren't for your activism, I wouldn't be able to walk out my front door and live in the open as who I am. Thank you for everything you've done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Your comments are appreciated.
But, no thanks needed - all the work was actually for a selfish reason; I just wanted my own life to matter, to mean something.

I am a little surprised you are still using the HRC logo given that Joe Solmonese (supreme DC villager who mostly worries about cocktail parties, dinner parties and signings) was standing behind Obama for the signing of the memo yesterday. And apparently still plans to attend the gala.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm glad you mentioned the HRC logo...
I mentioned in a thread at the end of last week that I was going to change it. I just did--to a badly formatted picture of myself that I'll fix later. It reflects who I will donate money and time to now--the rights of myself and others. Not cocktail parties, (that I'm not invited to at least), and certainly not candidates that support anything less than real equality now.

HRC's press release yesterday after the memo signing was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Joe Solmonese Had Pulled Out of the Fundraiser....Did He Change His Mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Marty Rouse - HRC national field director has pulled out.
I have not seen Joe mentioned as pulling out. Why would he? He was just at the WH yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ah, You're Right. I Guess I Assumed If One HRC Ass-Kiss Wasn't Going, Then Nobody Was.
Doesn't really matter. I gave up on the HRC when I realized they were cool with inequality as long as they kept getting paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Yes, we never hear about Dean putting a Pentecostal preacher in charge of things,
and we never, ever talk about how a big closeted dyke in party headquarters was advocating against us while Dean was running things.

I like Dean a lot, mind you, but he let the DNC sell us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Have we really just been an ATM? I don't even know what to think at this point..."
They want our money, our support and our votes. Otherwise they want us to STFU and stay the hell out of their way. They especially don't want us doing anything unseemly, like holding them to their promises or (gasp) demanding the rights they all take for granted and we've been denied for centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. For years they have targeted our money.
Us queers do have way more expendable income than the other folks. I actually wrote a paper on this issue in 1980 while in graduate school. I just came across it the other day. My conclusion was even better than I remembered regarding the LGBT community becoming a viable political force. The Professor liked my writing and research but disagreed with my conclusion. I would like to run in to him again.

We had a place at the table in the Democratic Party for decades until Dean's tenure. Most did not realize what was going on at the national level. Now we are not only not at the table, we are not even under the big tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, basically they're saying they don't even care if the GLBT community is in the party
That really speaks volumes.

Boy, have we been had. November is the last time I will ever vote for the "least worst candidate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffreyWilliamson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Boy, have we been had."
No kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No. It's worse. They're saying "Go ahead. Leave. We dare you!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Actually, what they are saying is "go ahead, leave...we'll BLAME you"
Edited on Fri Jun-19-09 11:57 AM by Zodiak
When the republicans take control again.

And of course, these assholes LIKE it when Republicans are in control. They get the policies they want implemented (corporate) and don't have to be bothered with being responsible for anything.

Alenating their base with republican policies and then blaming the base when they lose is the DLC/Third Way/blue dog way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. ...


Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanr516 Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. I'm with you
I have become a "little d" democrat. It's going to take more than just a letter behind a candidate's name to earn my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. The main thing I can say for the Stonewall Dems
is that they are making their voices heard very clearly and biting back where it hurts. They key to any action is top stop being an ATM machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yes
It's the only thing that gets their attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Which happened first, Stonewall pullout or the DNC withholding support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Fundamentalists need to be shown the door from the DNC...
at gunpoint if need be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Instead, though, we have given them the keys and authority over the guest list.
It's more of that "pragmatic" bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It creates a perfect storm should the GOP clean up its house...
A schism between the working class and between affluent left-liberals is the last thing the DNC should be allowing to happen if it wishes to consolidate power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC