Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On FDA...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 03:08 PM
Original message
On FDA...
While the FDA key positions like all other agencies are filled by appointees - I find many of the people to be career employees - MD's PhD's.

However policies seems to be coming down from the parent agency the DHHS. Well currently former EPA, Leavitt is Secretary.

Interesting, however is his deputy:
Biography of Eric D. Hargan
Acting Deputy Secretary
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

As Acting Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services, Eric D. Hargan is the chief operating officer of the largest civilian department in the federal government, with a budget of $640 billion and more than 67,000 employees. Working closely with Secretary Mike Leavitt, Hargan oversees all operations, including Medicare, Medicaid, public health, medical research, the regulation of food and drugs, welfare, child and family services, disease prevention, Indian health, mental health services, and many other activities. He also serves as the Regulatory Policy Officer for HHS, overseeing the development and approval of all HHS regulations and significant guidances. In addition, he leads a number of initiatives at the Department, including implementing the President’s Management Agenda, ....

snip

Prior to joining HHS, Hargan was a partner in the Chicago headquarters of the law firm of Winston & Strawn, where he specialized in corporate law, particularly mergers and acquisitions, securities, and venture capital transactions.

http://www.hhs.gov/about/bios/deputysecretary.html

any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kessler is the last FDA Secretary that knew squat about FDA
its mission and cared at all... Since then, just a series of anti-regulatory anti-consumer cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder also was this position also referred as COO
chief operating officer - in the past?

It sounds like a corporation...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. thats a govt fad actually
trying to make departments more efficient by modeling them after businesses. At my department at NIH (before I got there) my supervisor was referred to as co-chief (cochair really is what he was) but before that he was a clear number two but was referred to as the department CEO. Trust me, this guy was a SCIENTIST with some administration skills, not what one would think of as an CEO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and has the "business model" in fact been more efficient?
just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. In the case I know about..
the so called "CEO" who was BY FAR, the most brilliant, honest, efficient scientist I ever met was forced out because he "behaved improperly" by trying to fire and demote people who were either a) lazy, b) incompetant or c) dishonest (and in at least one case all three) and not doing their jobs. That would have to be a big fat NO, then wouldn't it!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. lol
thanks..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are right
And not just about FDA. I think HHS appointees are busy doing damage to NIH as well. I know one high up at NIH who used to be a PhD at FDA but screwed up a safety study badly around 2000, with MD and pHD's calling for this person to be fired. Not long after this person got an NIH post overseeing many of the same kind of studies. Sound familiar? Since this is a admin post, I am sure it was more of an appointment and that kind of thing seems to be handled by the parent HHS...:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. it is really bizarre..
considering, the post yesterday about the 100 appointees from corporate America - this appointment system seems to be rife with potential for abuse.

Should there not be better qualification requirements?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the problem sometimes is NOT the qualifications
I am sure the person I am talking about was "qualified" but still shouldn't have the job. As for the corporate appointees, from Biotech--let me say that it is common for career biologists to move back and forth from private biotech to govt research and back again. That was me-private-govt-private. Just because these people used to work for certain companies does not necessarily mean they got their jobs by cronyism and are unqualified. But it could be cronyism too. I would like to see the scientists that work under an appointee get a say. That MIGHT help. Of course that would be counterproductive if you are not going for competence as is the case with any and all Bush appointments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. so true
and then you have those really obvious off-the wall appointments, too. FEMA & the guy above.

Perhaps, like judges - get a consensus opinion..

but it seems either the Dems have been asleep or just gave up and deemed it all as futile under the repub grip until last Novemember.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC