Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jackson’s Death May Be Black Mark for Twitter (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 06:50 AM
Original message
Jackson’s Death May Be Black Mark for Twitter (NYT)
Jackson’s Death May Be Black Mark for Twitter
June 26, 2009, 7:19 am

The news of Michael Jackson’s untimely death rocked Twitter as fans of the pop music star sought the latest information and posted their reactions to the news.

Shortly after TMZ, a news entertainment site, published a report around 5 p.m. stating that Mr. Jackson had died after suffering a heart attack, thousands of messages expressing disbelief, grief and remembrances flooded the Twitter microblogging service, causing the site to load more slowly than usual and crash multiple times.

The spike in users apparently overloaded Twitter’s search engine, causing it to return results sporadically, if at all.

Twitter subsequently announced Thursday that said it had disabled the search field on users’ home pages entirely.

PaidContent suggested that the search engine meltdown did not bode well for Twitter’s ambitions to be a “real-time” search engine, which is viewed by many industry observers to be its most valuable feature.

Whether Twitter will be able to leverage its popularity to make money is the subject of much debate in the industry. During the elections in Iran, Twitter proved a useful source of information for news outlets, leading to suggestions that its value might be connected to its utility as a real-time reporting tool.

<SNIP>

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/jacksons-death-may-be-black-mark-for-twitter/?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't use Twitter, having a difficult time figuring it out
But Facebook was pretty slow too and the news sites were all but useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When big news is breaking, I go to twitter.
Then, hit the 'search' button on the bottom. Search the topic of interest and you can get news coming in fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Same here.
I've virtually abandoned google for news. And i've totally "moth-balled" my RSS reader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. don't they just have to upgrade to allow for more users ?
this doesn't seem unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The technology is trying to keep up with demand.
A few glitches are expected along the way. And Twitter definitely has those. I know...first hand. Seems Twitter has been dumping legitimate users (like myself) by the thousands into "spam jail" such that their tweets are no longer visible to anyone outside their group of followers. Should be a faily simple fix...one would think. Ugh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. This proves that Michael Jackson is more important than the Iran elections.
MJ crashed their servers multiple times,
but their servers easily handled the Iran election, protests, and massacres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. i think the difference is that many were viewing Twitter to during Iran elections
but with Jacksons Death many wanted to post their thoughts, memories etc.

i don't use or even go to the website. i do read what others post from there on DU and elsewhere. but don't use it myself.

i think for things like Iran it can be useful but i never cared what it was mostly used for by most people which is share their every thought or what they are doing every moment.

i can understand people wanting to share their memories of Jackson but doesn't Twitter limit the characters people can use ? i would think some blog or other site would be better to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Huh? Were They Expecting Jacko To Tweet From The Hereafter?
What if they had a big event and it was over-covered? What good is Twitting? The facts of the day were pretty cut and dried the moment Jacko's people called the ambulence, the media feeding frenzy was on and will deluge us for days to come.

As is the case with these type of stories, there are periods of time where there is nothing to report and the silence drives the media and Twitter crazy. It's lots of conjecture and bloviating to fill the void...but in due time the real story came forward and then it was rehash time...and rehash and rehash.

I found it interesting watching Facebook and to see how quickly people got the information...what they passed along and the reaction. Most were dubious of TMZ's quick claim and I was as well...as if they were wrong, they could walk it back and few would notice while if they were right, we won't hear the end of it and the horrid Harvey Levin.

Twitter's 15 minutes is not that far away as newer, more sophisticated handheld wireless toys will make that site the Napster of 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. TRANSLATION: Twitter scooped us again--we must marginalize it
Edited on Fri Jun-26-09 07:56 AM by rocktivity
If the overflow forced Twitter to shut down the search engine, that's a sign of how popular it is, not how incompetent.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's a black mark because damn near everybody went to it? Holy Up Is Down, Batman!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Speaking of MJ and Twitter
After his death yesterday I got a chill thinking about what I saw on Twitter last weekend.
Someone was spamming the tweets with hperlinks trying to get people to click on their sales websites by using shit like "breaking news: (insert random celebrity name here) is DEAD.
One of the names they used: Michael Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC