This genious says there is no Global Warming...

There is no such thing as greenhouse gases
CO2 is the reason why we are alive
The arctic only accounts for 6 percent of the ice in the world and the ice is making a come back.
The Antarctica, which accounts for 90 percent of the worlds ice, which no one mentions, has been getting thicker over the past 6000 years.

General consensus ?? LOL - www.petitionproject.org over 30,000 real scientists debunked this 10 years ago. umBama has this, but of course didn't listen. None of my professors, in Chemistry and Physics, believe this bull either and they are liberals (of course).

Heat cannot be trapped within a system ad infinitum.
This is no physical barrier.
How come CO2 rised during the 40s to the 70s, but global temps fell?

And all your excess "CO2" - CO2 + H20 =====> H2CO3, there it is.

GET A CLUE GREENTARDS!

(No snark, I want to know when I inadvertently misspell a word in a post.)

This fraud is the source of the Denier myth that (variously) 17,000, 30,000, 60,000 etc "scientists" have denied its existence.

The Oregon Petition is a project by Arthur B. Robinson head of the tiny, industry funded so-called Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine.

It is an updated version of his notoriously fraudulent earlier attempts , the most recent being the 1998 Oregon Petition.

It's even been debunked at the Skeptics Society (the irony) "Misleading by Petition Just What is the Consensus on Global Warming?
Most of the names (of those that are legitimate, which aren't many) are from over a decade ago, in some cases almost twice that
age - like there's been no updates in the science recently? Quote from National Academy of Sciences

"The petition was so misleading that the National Academy issued a news release stating that:

The petition project was a deliberate attempt to mislead scientists and to rally them in an attempt to undermine support for the Kyoto Protocol. The petition was not based on a review of the science of global climate change, nor were its signers experts in the field of climate science." Source


http://debunking.pbworks.com/Oregon-Petition


just my dos centavos

robdogbucky

GET A CLUE GREENTARDS?

Wait... hold on... that kind of sounds like

GET A BRAIN MORANS!

Hey, I think I know this guy...

I'd like to put him in a room with just CO2 - see how long he lives.

See also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

Not to mention full of bullshit, of course. But spelling and grammar-wise, that's pretty typically conservative style.

http://www.petitionproject.org/qualifications_of_signers.php

2. Computer and mathematical sciences includes 935 scientists trained in computer and mathematical methods. Since the human-caused global warming hypothesis rests entirely upon mathematical computer projections and not upon experimental observations, these sciences are especially important in evaluating this hypothesis.

935 people with at least a BS in CS. Bullshit. Having a BS in CS (like ME, for example) does not make one either an expert on climate science nor on mathematical modeling.

Then there is this gem...

Atmosphere, Earth, & Environment (3,803)

1. Atmosphere (578)

I) Atmospheric Science (113)
II) Climatology (39)
III) Meteorology (341)
IV) Astronomy (59)
V) Astrophysics (26)

2. Earth (2,240)

I) Earth Science (94)
II) Geochemistry (63)
III) Geology (1,684)
IV) Geophysics (341)
V) Geoscience (36)
VI) Hydrology (22)

3. Environment (985)

I) Environmental Engineering (486)
II) Environmental Science (253)
III) Forestry (163)
IV) Oceanography (83)


1684 geologists... geologists could include my B-in-L, who is a wingnut mining engineer. He is about as dumb as a box of rocks. He knows nothing more about climate science than what Faux Snooze tells him. 341 Meterology... i.e. most of the "weather men / plastic bunnies" that read the weather forecast. They probably can't even correctly define what is climate and what is weather. Astronomy and Astrophysics.... hahahahahahahaha.

Get me a list of Climate Scientists, with PhDs... that don't believe that global warming is happening, or, if it is, that mankind has nothing to do with it and we shouldn't try to stop it, or failing that, that a rapid increase in CO2 is GOOD for the planet. Get me that list. Forget all the rest, they are bullshit. And, oh, the climate scientists cannot be dependent on grants from the fossil fuel people and should be published in peer reviewed journals. How many would that be? One or Two?