Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Israel And Bush Admin Have “Understanding” On Settlements? Even Bushies Say No.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:22 PM
Original message
Did Israel And Bush Admin Have “Understanding” On Settlements? Even Bushies Say No.
Edited on Mon Jun-29-09 12:25 PM by babylonsister
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/diplomacy/did-israel-and-bush-admin-have-understanding-on-settlements-bushies-say-no/

Did Israel And Bush Admin Have “Understanding” On Settlements? Even Bushies Say No.



With the Obama administration slowly wheeling into action to confront the Israel-Arab conflict, a key assertion made by some on the right is that the Bush administration and Israel reached an “understanding” by which Israel could proceed with certain types of settlement expansion.

The only problem with this assertion is that even Bush administration officials say it’s false.

This claim is important because it undercuts the Obama administration’s current approach to the region, which is partly to demand of Israel that settlements cease in all forms. It allows people on the right, as well as some senior Israeli officials, to complicate current diplomacy by portraying this as an abandonment of previous United States promises to Israel.

This assertion was made most recently by Elliott Abrams, who handled Mideast affairs at the National Security Council throughout the Bush years. “For reasons that remain unclear, the Obama administration has decided to abandon the understandings about settlements reached by the previous administration with the Israeli government,” Abrams wrote the other day in an Op ed piece that’s being heavily debated in diplomatic circles.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently rebutted this general claim, saying that the Bush administration and Israel reached “no informal or oral enforceable agreements” about settlements. So who’s right? Well, former Bush administration officials seem to side with Hillary.

In an April 24, 2008 article in the Washington Post, Bush White House spokesperson Gordon Johndroe flatly denied any agreement. “There is no understanding,” he said.

In that same article, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, too, denied any such understanding. “I never agreed to it,” he said.

Daniel Kurtzer, the U.S. ambassador to Israel from 2001-2005, has also denied any such arrangement, claiming that “there was no such understanding.”

This claim of an “understanding” between the Bush administration officials and Israel over settlements will likely continue to bedevil this process as it unfolds. So it’s worth keeping in mind that multiple Bush officials say it never happened.

************************************************************

Take that, Elliott Abrams!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=124&topic_id=278809
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks.
I'm cross-posting this in I/P. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Please do, and
:thumbsup: on this bit of news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Silence can equal acquiescence.
To Obama's credit, he has spoken openly about the need to stop the settlements, rather the wink and nod given by BushCorp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Even if they did, the settlements are still illegal under international law.
But it's interesting if Dubya didn't agree to support an ally's crimes against humanity. Wow, did even he draw the line somewhere? Or did he just not want to have to bail Israel out when it steals more Palestinian property?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC