|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:38 PM Original message |
Pawlenty was not ordered to sign, and Pawlenty said he would sign if ordered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PearliePoo2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. CRAP! CRAP CRAP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. I expect we'll see him sign the certificate shortly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Coleman has conceded, now Timmy will have to sign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. Correct, he was not "ordered", but on MN Public Radio I heard them say they believe he will sign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. It will depend on who he fears most, MN voters or the RNC. He does have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. His national aspirations is already dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Republicans depend on the short memories of the voting public. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. Since Coleman conceded, what will Pawlenty's alternative be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Pawlenty had said something about not signing when there were still court options |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Official Statement from Pawlenty's Office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It's over, it's over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. fuck pawlenty, coleman conceded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yeah, that was so sweet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lindisfarne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. In principle, the courts should not have ordered. The law is pretty clear. Only if Pawlenty fails to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
15. The certificate has been ordered to be signed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 09:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. If he's conceded, doesn't that mean he's given up the fight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-30-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That calls for a drink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC