Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Teen Pregancies Double

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
winter999 Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:48 AM
Original message
UK Teen Pregancies Double
£6m drive to cut teen pregnancies sees them DOUBLE

By Daniel Martin
Last updated at 8:20 AM on 08th July 2009


A multi-million pound initiative to reduce teenage pregnancies more than doubled the number of girls conceiving.

The Government-backed scheme tried to persuade teenage girls not to get pregnant by handing out condoms and teaching them about sex.

But research funded by the Department of Health shows that young women who attended the programme, at a cost of £2,500 each, were 'significantly' more likely to become pregnant than those on other youth programmes who were not given contraception and sex advice.

A total of 16 per cent of those on the Young People's Development Programme conceived compared with just 6 per cent in other programmes.

Experts said the scheme failed because it introduced girls 'at risk' of becoming pregnant to promiscuous girls they might not otherwise have met.

Because of peer pressure, the more timid teenagers were more likely to have sex and become pregnant.

The £5.9million YPDP programme was also designed to slash cannabis use and drunkenness among teenagers, but made no difference whatsoever.

Last night ministers pledged to drop the scheme after admitting it had failed. Around 40,000 teenage girls become pregnant every year in the UK, the highest level in western Europe.

The failed YPDP, launched in 2004, was based on a similar scheme in New York claimed to have significantly reduced teenage pregnancies.

However, attempts to replicate the work elsewhere in the U.S. did not lead to a fall in teenage pregnancies, casting doubt on the project as a whole.

In England, 2,371 teenagers took part in the programme over three years. They were nominated by social workers, teachers or NHS staff who thought they were at risk of school exclusion, drug abuse and pregnancy.

The study, published online by the British Medical Journal, was carried out by Meg Wiggins, from the Institute of Education at the University of London and Chris Bonell, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

They were commissioned by the Department of Health to evaluate the programme independently.

They concluded that 'at best, the programme had no impact - and at worst it had a negative impact'.

A Department of Health spokesman said: 'This pilot was based on a successful American programme. It did not appear to reduce teenage pregnancy so we will not be taking it any further.'

Case study - Lucy Lanelly

By the time she reached the age of consent, Lucy Lanelly had become pregnant four times.

And on each occasion the teenager from Toll Bar, South Yorkshire, had an abortion.

Now 19, she became pregnant at 12 after a single encounter with a 15-year-old boy.

She was then given a three-month contraceptive jab but failed to get another one.

The following year Lucy became pregnant by a 19-year-old man at a party. Her third pregnancy was by a 15-year-old boy who said he was infertile.

The last pregnancy was by her boyfriend Jack, 20, when a condom failed.

Lucy said: 'I don't regret having the terminations because I was too young to have a baby, but I do regret having sex when I wasn't mature enough to deal with it.'


Link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1198228/6m-drive-cut-teen-pregnancies-sees-DOUBLE.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oops. And, incidentally,
not all cultures work the same. What works (or not) in America, may work (or not) in other countries. Little pesky things like cultural barriers; they do exist...

Well, I thought it was obvious, but I'm weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winter999 Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Refer to
The failed YPDP, launched in 2004, was based on a similar scheme in New York claimed to have significantly reduced teenage pregnancies.

However, attempts to replicate the work elsewhere in the U.S. did not lead to a fall in teenage pregnancies, casting doubt on the project as a whole.


I didn't realize that British and American cultures were so vastly different that you'd end up getting widely opposite results. Who'd of thunk?

I seem to recall reading that the D.A.R.E. anti-drug program that swept the nation had similar results. Rather than training kids away from drugs, it taught them to be more adept at using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. maybe to do with year 2004 being a different time than now. seems to work in ny and
not other places where it was later tried.

maybe it is to do with the time and not other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. isn't Bristol in the UK? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. No, she's in Wasilla
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. An Epidemic of Twins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obliviously Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's the mother ship
they have come to visit us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why does it seem like no one can ever prove these theories in the US?
They always have to go to the UK to come up with contrary evidence.

Moreover, I'd like to learn more about this program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. winter999, Please post no more than 4 paragraphs of copy righted material. Please edit your post.
Thanks, pinto.
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. A misleading headline
Uk teen pregnancies have not doubled. This was about a trial of 2,371 teenagers, and in the trial the pregnancy rate went from 6% to 16%, compared to similar populations. So this was about 237 extra pregnancies.

So, the trial failed. But, being a trial, it won't have had a significant effect on the country's teen pregnancy rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Lucy" (the case study) is the victim of tragically uninvolved parenting -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC