|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:40 PM Original message |
Why did anyone WANT an "unrecommend" feature, anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Towlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe they want to be like Digg and Reddit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContinentalOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
102. Yep, or Slashdot, or Amazon ratings or any of the many other sites on the web... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Easy....because a certain group of people are tired of seeing objectivity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yup. That's what I'd say, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. yep...'xactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
111. Oh noes!!1 Teh clicks! teh clicks!!!111! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'd like to see one for individual responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Some people felt there was too much "unfair" criticism of Obama making it to the Greatest Page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. they're the chris crocker GD:P types |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I don't know that reference. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. remember the "leave britney alone" guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. Ah. I always thought that was a girl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Here's the link to the ref: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. From comments in threads about this, it appears to be about "Obama bashing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
84. That, and any criticism of the two party system in general. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #84 |
93. There's two? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Ha, well, you know what I'm driving at. Actually this new option only highlights the differences.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. We'll see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Exactly. Been wondering why this was needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. I think it was about the "greatest" page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. Because a disruptor and five friends could take tasteless OPs to the Greatest Page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Yeah and that happened ALL the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. his example is someone posting a holocaust denial thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Uh, could you clue in the rest of the class? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Obviously not....mr. daemons has been using that as an example in his defense of the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
52. That was one extreme example... here's another.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. Isn't the "alert" feature counterbalance enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #65 |
90. "Counterbalance" doesn't matter for those who prefer to deem leftists as "whiners" a la Repug style |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. That's an extreme example, to be sure..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. "Tasteless"? That's not something the Admins and Mods could address? What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. I can count the number of "tasteless" threads I've seen on one hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
92. It's called REACHING in order to dodge the real reason some are sooo happy over the unrec option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. It could be part of the "Hope, Change"movement. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. I hadn't really thought about it until the feature came out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. You can do that by DEBATING the people pushing in the opposite way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Why not allow pushing against in ALL WAYS that people are able to push pro? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
51. Is it ever really necessary to try to stop a discussion on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. As soon as you tell me how unrec stops a discussion, I'll take you seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Allowing an organized campaign to keep threads OFF the Greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Is no different from allowing an organized campaign to keep threads ON the Greatest. Durr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. You have never provided a single example of a thread that justified "unrecommending" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Right after you point me to a discussion that's been silenced by unrec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. That's the only reason to have an unrec function and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Show me a discussion that's been silenced because of unrec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. "unrec" just started today. It's too early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Gotcha. Let me know when it happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #87 |
103. Why should censorship be given the benefit of the doubt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Um, giving MORE people a voice in what goes to Greatest is the OPPOSITE of censorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. If their using their voice to restrict other people's voices from being heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #105 |
110. So you want to restrict people who wish to unrec's voices from being heard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Yes, because those who want to "unrec" are censors, and we don't NEED censors here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #85 |
100. Perhaps also too early for you to judge how it will play out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. Why are you such a fan of the idea? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:50 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Because there are many stupid posts that don't deserve to go on the greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:52 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. "President Obama has never been the victim of unfair criticism here".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:03 PM Response to Reply #108 |
115. Evidently not, since you've provided no examples. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Why should a small cabal be able to RAISE any thread they like to the Greatest page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. threads that get 100+ recs are a "small cabal"????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. The greatest page is 5. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. Yes, but a lot of the threads that people want to get rid of (those critical of Obama) often got 100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
60. Do you know that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. start an opposing thread then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. Scared of people having a chance to react to what you have to say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Er. because starting a discussion is a positve act while preventing one is a negative act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
119. Because starting a discussion does no harm, whereas stopping one usually does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #29 |
62. how can a small cabal block a thread from the greatest page? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
16. I wanted one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
57. Why isn't it enough to express that by debating the posters they find idiotic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. You could ask the same about positive support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IADEMO2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. Always with the negative vibes Moriarty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
26. I'm guessing that certain topics showing up on the Home Page were making certain factions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. +1 -- they have no counter-arguments besides personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
47. I hate to disappoint you but it's a two way street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
91. So? I've never complained about posts I don't agree with appearing on the Home Page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. 2 are better than 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
30. It keeps highly polarizing flamewars from clogging the Greatest Page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
83. Isn't it enough that the mods shut those threads off as soon as they start? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
34. DLC rah rahs thought they had enough influence to keep threads off the greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. turns out they do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Not this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Exactly.... and so threads that reflect the majority opinion of DUers will be on the greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Nailed it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. Because I'm tired of not having a say when I see crap on the DU home page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. see this is so typical -- according to a lot of you, all criticism MUST be coming from the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
66. Wow, put words much into other folks mouth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
40. I've never understood "The Greatest" page in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
41. Suppression is not a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaaaaa5a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
44. Please explain to me how this works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
45. Yes, I like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
49. It would have been nice when the Greatest Page was flooded with "Hey gays, STFU!" threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. now it's just going to be used as a tool to do just that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Really.... threads criticizing Obama will be deleted from DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #61 |
114. Moving them off the Greatest page is the same as silencing those threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #114 |
123. And why should threads that only have the support of 5 or 6 nimrods out of thousands of DUers make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-10-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
58. Because it bums some people out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. +1,000,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
69. I prefer a +/- for individual posters... LOL but, I guess they wanted to avoid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
74. If the point of the recommend is to have DU'ers decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
75. Because people get to voice their opinion on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
77. Good Question. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
78. Passive agression and cowardly face slapping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adsos Letter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
80. Because there was a lack of drama here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
88. so this ancient codebase can finally start acting like web 2.0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
89. This is so interesting. Yesterday I posted a thread about the Honduran coupster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Perfect example. The organized RW disruptors now have a great new tool to prevent the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. More, they tried to down a thread defending Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
98. Why? To keep stupid shit off the GP. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:33 PM Response to Reply #98 |
122. And those who favor the "unrecommend" features are the only ones who can judge this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
99. yea.. the Freepers wanted it..!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
101. Did yu read Skinner's original thread?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
109. Ken, read this please: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #109 |
113. OK, Skinner seems to have freaked in those threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
116. Why can't your thread be recommended? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
117. There was a thread today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #117 |
120. I respect your wish to protect your child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:18 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Profanity is not against DU rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milspec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-09-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
118. Like T-Rex has a big head and little arm's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC