Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morning Joe = Fox Jr.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
optimal-tomato Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:15 AM
Original message
Morning Joe = Fox Jr.
Even today, with Scarborough gone, Brzezinski gone, and Geist gone.
Mike Barnacle, who claims to be left of center, Donny Deutsch, who claims to be a liberal.
They just agreed that "The CIA needs to have secret assassination squads, and I don't want Nancy Pelosi to sign off on that."

WTF?! MSNBC is supposed to be OUR CHANNEL! Why can't we at least have a single representative voice in the morning?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dan Senor spewed his nonsense so I came here instead. Very annoying....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. huh? - "our channel"??????
I guess I missed something.

When did MSNBC go on the D-payroll?

What's wrong with a balanced discussion? We can handle it. We can filter. The show still has the best guest line-up in the morning, perhaps throughout the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimal-tomato Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Our Channel" according to conservatives, I meant.
The same way that Fox actually is an arm of the RNC, MSNBC is allegedly a liberal-slanted news organization.

My point was that the discussion was not balanced. Morning Joe usually has Joe (RW Republican), Mika (supposedly liberal, but actually conservative on most issues), Mike (read Mika), Willie (not usually political, but conservative on most issues), and Pat Buchannan (nationalistic archconservative). Originally, there was balanced discussion, and I enjoyed it, but Mika and Mike have slowly shifted to become Joe Scarburough apologists. They agree with him, and defend him by saying "I'm a liberal and I agree with Joe!"

And today there was Mike Barnacle and Donny Deutsch (both supposedly left-of-center) and two far-right idiots. The most liberal of the four, Deutsch, proposed that the CIA should have assassination squads and shouldn't notify Congress about it. The other three agreed wholeheartedly. That's not discussion. That's not debate. I would welcome debate!

My point is that even on the most liberal cable channel (and I would argue that it is the most liberal in general), there is still a panel of 4 people ranging from right-of-center to very-far-right. Not a single liberal counterbalance.

Without Lawrence O'Donnell showing up in the last hour, I literally could have gotten more balanced debate from Fox & Friends. If MSNBC is going to take all the garbage about being leftist, why not follow through on it and have a decent morning show with left and right represented? Morning Larry (with Joe, Pat, and Mika).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Always has been...
I do give them credit for having people like Lawrence O'Donnell as guests. Yesterday Janet Napolitano and Kathleen Sebelius were on there. You wouldn't see that on FOX, especially O'Donnell, who made the rest of them look like complete idiots.

As for MSNBC being "our channel", it was not that long ago that it was being referred to as "MSRNC". Yeah, so they have on Keith, Rachel, David Schuster and Ed. That's only four or five hours out of 24, and another two or three if one counts repeats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. On The Assassination Squad Thing... Did Anyone Ask...
when these squads would be deployed domestically. Seeing as they're so useful abroad, why not use them stateside? ..short sighted morans.

JAy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC