|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 12:57 PM Original message |
Poll question: What is your un-Rec to Rec ratio for the last couple of days (optionally post more info)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. If it weren't for the i-hate-unrec threads, it would be about even. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Me too...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. I've only recommended one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. I HATE unrec, but I am unrecommending bullshit because I'm giving what I got. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The unrec feature can never work well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. I've Unrecommended more than I've recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I mostly agree, but I don't think of either rec or unrec as needing to be used in most cases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. We're already seeing fewer of the serial thread starters' threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I like the convenience of the no-confirmation rec/unrec, but I do think the speedbump... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. What about the ego of those that want to control content? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Huh? I'm actually not sure what your whine means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Allow me translate for him ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Roger that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Phony premise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. Other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. 4 rec -1 UN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Hi, emily! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 06:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Hi Forkboy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
17. I've been deliberately recommending more posts than I did before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC