|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 07:50 PM Original message |
A Suggestion For Finessing UnReckers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. As long as you're on the nuking hyperbole, why not go whole-hog, and call it thread GENOCIDE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 07:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. Well, since none of us can effect the changes you suggest, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. An interesting idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Winning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrycarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. You are thinking about it too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You're not thinking about it all. Thank you for the generic comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angrycarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. At least I didn't push the unrec button on you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Good points. Thanks again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. It seems the bare minimum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. < 0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Thank you for volunteering. Good bye. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. I was never in the habit of "recking" threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I think a lot of good folks are not going to bother doing either. Making it a contest with no tally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. Another idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 08:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I have the feeling that for some of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Yeah that just takes to long to say, "an online auction bid-sniping tool." How about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:42 PM Original message |
Suggesting that the Greatest page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
22. Sure, most controversial, or simply most worthy of genuine debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
53. I agree but it is more than just "childish". It reinforces majority prejudice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. "Regressive" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. I think the unrec feature is silly and really embarassing for DU, but I'll live with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. OK one of the more thoughtful and reason-able posts on this matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Wait Til Obama And The Dems In Congress Do Something Really Stupid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 11:59 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. If this is truly a Clinton Admin Redux |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Haven't A Clue Really, But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:12 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Maybe Rush Limbaugh strongarmed about the Armed Forces MegaRecced thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:16 AM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Perhaps it will be very homogenized here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
20. I don't think an unrec actually does kick the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:01 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. That's my suggestion. It would be a more deliberate act and let Recced threads breathe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. this whole development has really wounded you, hasn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. That's a full load of dishonest horseshit and after YOUR antics regarding this, totally hypocritical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beam me up scottie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. IIRCC, this poster wanted to be able to block posters from posting in her threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Speaking of stalkers, that has nothing to do with this thread. And misrepresents AS USUAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. On the plus side, this controversy has nicely replaced the multiple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canetoad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-11-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yup. It's 'Community Building'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. It's Groupthink Building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 01:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Deleted message |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 01:13 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. YOU CAN, lady! sorry for calling you a dude if you aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canetoad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:36 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I abhor bloodsports, but watching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. What a great and sensible way to live. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
67. "These people" "monolithic concensus" "delusional" "irony" "marginalized" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:23 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. You must have quite an agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
31. oh lord, here we go again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
36. kick and unrec'd. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
41. Deleted message |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:48 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. uh, I've used the unrec button twice since it was instituted, and I wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:50 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 05:39 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Deleted message |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. I read through many threads looking for the need and rationale behind it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. So be it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
42. good grief. what is this the 20th OP you've started on this subject? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
51. ...or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
46. Good idea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I appreciate that, LWolf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. The obvious problem with "unrec" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
50. I am rather tickled at some of the posts on this topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:44 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. As I said, this has brought out an immediate flood of belligerent passive/aggressives pleased with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChimpersMcSmirkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
54. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
55. Not a bad idea... At the very least, it will show once & for all how the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. At the least, it will make people think about use and prevent some misuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
62. I have an idea. Only Indigo Children can rec and unrec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:58 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I've got a button |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. Now please, OM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Oops, wrong place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
63. Let it sink! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
65. Unreccing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
66. You got a rec from me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
68. Kick to keep this active, ma'am. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC