|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:21 AM Original message |
Un-Rec This If You Dare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. oooo goody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. Ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Ironic. Everyone says the new feature is supposed to keep silly subject lines off of the front page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. I hope that never happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
5. unrecommending just for the damn apostrophe in "its" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. thanks grammar police... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I think we should get rid of apostrophes altogether, even for contractions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
7. That's not fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
8. Done! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
9. I'm sure that many "moderates" have tried to remove this post from "the greatest" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. very good point(s). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Moving a post down a list is not "censoring" - unrecommending does not get the post deleted...sheesh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. Unrecommending a post does not get it deleted..ergo, no "censoring"..where did you get that idea?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhrobbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 01:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
35. It's becoming clearer that this 'unrec' is not the benign feature it is proclaimed to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
14. I desperately wanted to unrec this thread, but I couldn't. k&r n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. K/R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
16. you got me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
17. While I am usually up for a dare... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Martin Eden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. Not much of a dare ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
20. EEK! I accidentally unrec'ed. My bad! So here's a kick, at least. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. Okay, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
22. I own the film. k&u |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. so you are kicking for those who don't own the movie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCaliDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
23. Un -rec a Michael Moore? HEEEEL NO. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. The only Michael Moore film I've never watched. Been avoiding it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
25. How about I reccomend it instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
27. Anybody who unrecs this should be exposed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I unrec'd it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saynt (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-12-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
28. I actually sat here and watched the whole thing at my computer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
32. Unrec'd because I don't like being challenged, and because it simply doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
33. I DID IT!!!!! I'M 100 REC & I ERASED THE UNREC!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
34. Unred'd, because I hate conformity, and I take dares. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #34 |
40. I DARE You To Eat This... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhrobbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
36. It is amazing the maturity level required to unrec something positive simply because the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUlover2909 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 03:18 AM Response to Original message |
37. That's bad-ass. I hope more people get to see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 04:50 AM Response to Original message |
38. Thanks for posting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-13-09 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
39. Danmmit! >.< |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC