Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sotomayor blog: judicial restraint

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 01:46 PM
Original message
Sotomayor blog: judicial restraint
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/07/sotomayor_blog_judicial_restra.html

Sotomayor blog: judicial restraint
Posted July 13, 2009 1:53 PM
The Swamp

by James Oliphant

Imagine for a moment you are Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

In your New York courtroom, you are lord and master--and you can speak anytime you wish and interrupt lawyers at will.

Now imagine having to sit here in Hart 216 for--now it's going on two hours--not being able to respond when senators criticize, attack or even distort, at times, your record, as they question your judgement, your neutrality, your view of the law. It must feel something listening to you own negative eulogy.

Sotomayor will get her chance of course. For days. But it's not an easy thing for anyone trained in argument, as Sotomayor is, to sit quietly and simply take it.

Take Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla, who, without explicitly saying it, does not seem to believe Sotomayor can be a neutral judge. "The thing that binds us together is an innate trust that you can have fair and impartial judgment in this country."
he said. "I am concerned with some of your statements. I dont know if the statements were made to be provocative or truly heartfelt for what you have said."

"Your judicial philosophy might be inconsistent with a partial neutral arbiter," said Coburn, who is unlikely to vote for Sotomayor regardless. "You must prove to the Senate you will adhere to the proper role of a judge."

Sotomayor will get to respond--soon. Just a few more senators to go first, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC