Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pot, Meet Kettle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:47 PM
Original message
Pot, Meet Kettle
http://mediamatters.org/blog/200907130041

Pot, Meet Kettle

July 13, 2009 5:38 pm ET by Jamison Foser

Chris Matthews on Hardball moments ago, referring to books by David Corn, Mike Isikoff, and Ron Suskind detailing Bush administration practices: "You guys are writing books after the fact. It didn't do us much good at the time, though."

In fact, Suskind's One Percent Doctrine was published in 2006, as was Corn & Isikoff's Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.

And what good was Chris Matthews doing us "at the time"?

On November 28, 2005, just weeks before Hubris was published, Matthews said of Bush "Everybody sort of likes the president, except the real whack-jobs, maybe on the left." (It wasn't true.) Two days later, Matthews praised a Bush speech about Iraq - a speech Bush had not, technically, delivered yet -- as a "brilliant political move" and dismissed Democratic critics as "carpers and complainers."

A month earlier, Matthews said Bush "glimmers" with "sunny nobility."

In February 2006, after Hubris was published, Matthews said of Bush: "He looks like he's a wise man now ... almost Atticus Finch."

Then, of course, there's Matthews embarrassing "Mission Accomplished" performance.

Oh, and his March 2006 endorsement of Bush's trustworthiness: "How can you not trust a man who says, 'I won't be able to win this war in my presidency; I'm leaving it up to other presidents in the future'?"


Matthews probably isn't the best person to call out the media for being critical of the Bush administration now, but not doing so when Bush was in office.

UPDATE: ... and Suskind and Corn are pretty far down on the list of people who deserve such criticism. Like, near the bottom. Or on another list entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tweety's an effing jerk
Always has been
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. But we all know that's not what Matthews for paid for (critizing Bush). nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't Suskind also do Sec. of Treasury O'Neil's book, also?
The book where O'Neil at the first security meeting said they pulled out the map of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes - The Price of Loyalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And that book was published in January of 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good for Media Matters for taking Tweety to the woodshed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is a nice limited list. but there are more. many more. I remember
wanting to throw things at the TV and turning it off in 2003 and 2004 and 2005. FUCK MSNBC. FUCK ALL OF TALK TV. I'm sick of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. That sorry SOB Matthews was
cheer leading all through the bush administration so who is he to say anything. He is so sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Absitively Correct, babylonsister...
I had been saying this for YEARS here, and would be shouted down by the pro-Tweety faction here. My contention is that he would throw in a little 'doubt' during the program so that later, if it didn't work out (and it didn't), he could (and did) say..."See, I knew this was a problem!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. thank you for posting this
Anyone who isn't aware that Tweety is a tool is not paying attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I cannot understand why people like CM.
He is an obvious Poppy cult follower and loves Saint Reagan. I'm surprised his lips aren't chapped from all the fluffing he has done over the years for neo-con artists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. tweety's an ass....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC