Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr. Ricci

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:54 PM
Original message
Mr. Ricci
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 01:55 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I have empathy for Mr. Ricci but what about every other person who didn't get a job because they were black, brown, yellow, Jewish, gay or transgendered.

This is just Republicant attempts to divide us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Federation of Planets ruled in the 23rd century
.... that living persons are not responsible for the past crimes of their ancestors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe The Case Was Wrongly Decided
But he sure was full of attitude...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, uppity even.
But you know how those people with learning disabilities are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mister Chronic Lawsuit Filer
he should have his own Bud radio commercial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Has He Filed Other Lawsuits?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. iirc, yes -- another earlier employment suit. HERE:
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 03:04 PM by elehhhhna

The New Haven firefighter is no stranger to employment disputes.


Ricci is invariably painted as a reluctant standard-bearer; a hardworking man driven to litigation only when his dreams of promotion were shattered by a system that persecutes white men. This is the narrative we will hear next week, but it somewhat oversimplifies Ricci's actual employment story. For instance, it's not precisely true, as this one account would have it, that Frank Ricci "never once special treatment for his dyslexia challenge." In point of fact, Ricci sued over it.

According to local newspapers, Ricci filed his first lawsuit against the city of New Haven in 1995, at the ripe old age of 20, for failing to hire him as a firefighter. That January, the Hartford Chronicle reported that Ricci sued, saying "he was not hired because he is dyslexic." The complaint in that suit, filed in federal court, alleged that the city's failure to hire Ricci because of his dyslexia violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. Frank Ricci was one of 795 candidates interviewed for 40 jobs. According to his complaint, the reason he was not hired was that he disclosed his dyslexia in an interview. That case was settled in 1997 with a confidential settlement in which Ricci withdrew his lawsuit in exchange for a job with the fire department and $11,143 in attorney's fees.

In 1998, Ricci was talking about filing lawsuits again, this time over a dispute with his new employer, Middletown's South Fire District—which had hired him in August of 1997. According to a Hartford Courant report of Aug. 11, 1998, Ricci was dismissed from the Middletown fire department after only eight months. He promptly appealed his dismissal, claiming that fire officials had retaliated against him for conducting an investigation into the department's response to a controversial fire. A story in the Hartford Courant dated Aug. 9, 1997, has Ricci vowing "to pursue this to the fullest extent of the law."

http://www.slate.com/id/2222087/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thoe damn handies. Who do they think they are?
I say limit lawsuits to only one per lifetime for the handicapped.

He should be thankful the city even hired a handicap like him to begin with.
Now he wants a promotion that he earned? The nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. oh spare me, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He's a serial filer - he sued to get his job (claiming discrimination - he's dyslexic)
and he sued for his promotion.

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Two suits makes one a serial filer? Since he won both maybe they were legit.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 05:04 PM by Fire_Medic_Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. So he did not get a promotion???
BFD...:eyes:

Obviously ~~ it had to have been someone's fault that "MR PERFECT" did not suceed, right?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Repukes brought Mr. Ricci to center stage so he might evoke empathy, the same quality they
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 12:41 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
don't want Sotomayor to have when judging cases. Isn't it ironic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's not OK to discriminate against one person because a third person was discriminated against.
That's not really a very good moral principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC