Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orly Taitz Creating "Disastrous Consequences" For Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:41 PM
Original message
Orly Taitz Creating "Disastrous Consequences" For Military
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/15/obama-birther-celebrates/

Obama birther claims soldier’s revoked orders will have ‘disastrous’ ‘consequences’ for the U.S. military.
The reserve soldier who argued he should not have to go to Afghanistan because of far-fetched claims that President Obama is not legally eligible to be commander-in-chief has had his deployment orders revoked. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook filed a request with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia on July 8 seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector because he believes Obama is not a natural born citizen. Though the military has refused to say why the order was revoked, Cook’s lawyer, renowned Obama conspiracy theorist Orly Taitz, was spinning it as a victory. “They have no cards to play with,” Taitz gleefully told Military.com:

“Can you imagine what are the consequences? This is disastrous” for the administration, she said. “We’ll have no military. Because anytime any Soldier, any Sailor, any Airman does not want to follow any orders, all he has to do is call an attorney and say ‘I don’t want to follow this order because I question the legitimacy of the commander in chief.’ “

Cook, an Individual Mobilization Augmentee, had volunteered for a year’s deployment to Afghanistan on May 8 and his orders were issued June 9. But all is not over for Cook or Taitz. A hearing on Cook’s requests will take place Thursday in the Columbus, Georgia federal court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Army handled this quite well.
The guy volunteered for a temporary active-duty position. As a reservist who volunteered for that position, he has the right to un-volunteer at any time up to the actual deployment. He wanted to not go, so the Army canceled his orders. By following existing regulations, the Army did not insert itself into the birther argument, which is why they did not address the issue, but just canceled his orders.
Now, if an Active Duty person tries this crap, they will be prosecuted under UCMJ Article 92, as well as others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Orly Taitz Creating "Disastrous Consequences" For
Republican Wing Nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would be nice if Obama could treat Taitz like Mr Lincoln did Congresscritter Vallandigham . . .
Later in the war, after some had criticized the arrest and detention of Congressman Clement Vallandigham of Ohio, Lincoln wrote to Erastus Corning in June 1862 that Vallandigham was arrested "because he was laboring, with some effect, to prevent the raising of troops, to encourage desertions from the army, and to leave the rebellion without an adequate military force to suppress it. . . . Must I shoot a simple-minded deserter, while I must not touch a hair of a wily agitator who induces him to desert?" Lincoln did not comment on the proper channels of due process regarding such "agitation."

Mr Lincoln eventually had Vallandigham escorted under guard to Tennessee and sent from there behind Confederate lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am going to be sure to tell my boss on Monday
that Orly said I don't have to follow his orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. DISMISSED!
"A hearing on Cook’s requests will take place Thursday in the Columbus, Georgia federal court."

Here is Judge Land's Order of Dismissal

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17438806/Cook-v-Good-Obama-DOC-10-Dismissal-Order

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmbell Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. orders
How else would you protest an unjust war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hes not protesting the justness of the war at all
He just doesn't like his commander.

Seems like the worst kind of soldier to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Where did he or his crazy lawyer raise the issue of the justice of the war?
They're just pissed because we elected a black man president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC