Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic congressman kicked out of Democrats for Life for supporting birth control.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:44 PM
Original message
Democratic congressman kicked out of Democrats for Life for supporting birth control.
This is truly a little upsetting to me. This group is having a lot to say about our Democratic policies on women's rights. For them to kick out a congressman who supports birth control is not a good thing.

Here is the article from Huffington Post about Tim Ryan.

Rep. Ryan 'Booted' From "Democrats For Life Of America" For Supporting Contraception


U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) has been, in his words, "booted" from the national advisory board of Democrats For Life of America. The group's mission is to elect and support pro-life Democrats; Ryan served on the board for four years but the relationship had recently soured when he co-sponsored the "Preventing Unintended Pregnancies, Reducing the Need for Abortion and Supporting Parents Act"

Ryan said he tried to convince officials with Democrats For Life of America, which he referred to Monday as a "fringe group," that the use of contraception is needed as part of any plan to reduce unintended pregnancies but that failed.

Kristen Day, Democrats For Life's executive director, was ready to move on. "DFLA gave Congressman Ryan ample opportunities to prove he's committed to protecting life, but he has turned his back on the community at every turn."

Ryan insists he's still a strong pro-life advocate. The proposed bill includes funding for comprehensive "teen pregnancy prevention" sex education and expanded coverage of "family planning" for low-income women. "We're working in Congress with groups that agree with preventative options while is getting left behind," Ryan said. "I can't figure out for the life of me how to stop pregnancies without contraception. Don't be mad at me for wanting to solve the problem."


Kristen Day is herself becoming quite a power in the Democratic Party.

Washington D.C., Jun 2, 2009 / 06:54 am (CNA).- Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life of America, has criticized the lack of support among the more “absolutist” Democratic supporters of abortion rights for a bill that aims to reduce the number of abortions by helping pregnant women. Day claimed the bill’s opponents think the bill “goes too far toward common ground.”

Day authored a May 22 essay in Newsday, titled “Is there a middle on abortion?”, explaining the provisions of the Pregnant Women Support Act (PWSA) and the proposed legislation’s political reception.

A “minority of Democrats on the pro-choice side” object to a provision requiring that abortion providers offer women the voluntary option of receiving pre-abortion counseling to learn of the risks associated with abortion, Day said.


She called pro-choice folks in the party "absolutists."

I spoke out strongly when one of Howard Dean's first acts was to invite the group to present their policy called the 95-10 Initiative at the DNC. Read part of the program. It does not mention birth control.

Democrats for Life want to control abortions with mentioning birth control.

The 95-10 Initiative

A comprehensive plan that will reduce the number of abortions by 95% in the next 10 years by promoting abstinence, personal responsibility, adoptions and support for women and families who are facing unplanned pregnancy. The 95-10 Initiative seeks to reduce the number of abortions in America through Federal, state and local efforts as well as support and encouragement to volunteers and dedicated people on the front lines helping pregnant women. Much attention has been given to ending abortion or keeping it legal. We believe that we must do more to reduce the abortion rate by helping and supporting pregnant women.


Not a word about birth control.

Tim Ryan was certainly expendable to the group. And as long as this group has such influence in our party women's rights will be expendable as well.

It puts these Democrats and other anti-choice Democrats in a clearer perspective.

Nineteen House members sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stating that they will not vote for health care reform legislation “unless it explicitly excludes abortion funding from the scope of any government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan.”

"We believe that a government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan, should not be used to fund abortion.

Furthermore, we want to ensure that the Health Benefits Advisory Committee cannot recommend abortion services be included under covered benefits or as part of a benefits package. Without an explicit exclusion, abortion could be included in a government subsidized health care plan under general health care. The health care reform package produced by Congress will be landmark, and with legislation as important as this, abortion must be addressed clearly in the bill text.

These are the signers: Dan Boren (Okla.), Bobby Bright (Ala.), Travis Childers (Miss.), Jerry Costello (Ill.), Kathy Dahlkemper (Penn.), Lincoln Davis (Tenn.), Steve Driehaus (Ohio), Tim Holden (Penn.), Paul Kanjorski (Penn.), Marcy Kaptur (Ohio), Mike McIntyre (N.C.), Charlie Melancon (La.), John Murtha (Penn.), Jim Oberstar (Minn.), Solomon Ortiz (Texas), Collin Peterson (Minn.), Heath Shuler (N.C.), Bart Stupak (Mich.), and Gene Taylor (Miss).


Here is more on the booting of Tim Ryan.

From Daily Kos:

Booting Tim Ryan

And make no mistake about it -- opposition to contraception is a fringe position. Among women who have ever had intercourse, 98% have used contraception, while among "fertile, sexually active women who do not want to become pregnant," 89% are using contraceptives, for a total of 62% of all women between the ages of 15 and 44.

I disagree with Ryan's position on abortion, but his support for measures to decrease unwanted pregnancies is one that can actually get us somewhere -- reducing abortions not by making them expensive, difficult, and frightening to get but by reducing unplanned pregnancies. This is a position that finds true common ground. How common? Planned Parenthood and Jim Wallis have signed on as supporters of this bill. NARAL and churches and religious leaders and theologians. That "Democrats for Life" rejects that common ground in favor of a radical anti-contraception agenda is telling, and counterproductive.


A Democrats for Life group boots a Democratic congressman for supporting contraception.

It just does not get weirder than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're whackos with a 'Democrats..." in their name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrats_for_Life_of_America

Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) is an advocacy group in the United States attempting to reshape the political left, primarily the Democratic Party, into taking a pro-life position. Usually this involves political opposition to abortion, but DFLA also opposes capital punishment and euthanasia. Democrats for Life of America's position on abortion is in opposition to the current platform of the Democratic Party, which supports legal access to abortion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They are doing a pretty good job of "reshaping the left"....IMHO
Seems to me people are not willing to stand up that much on things like this anymore.

It is like they have worn us down with all their activism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Possibly even Republican's using our Name. See: Democrats for Ehrlich
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 08:16 PM by Wizard777
That was an organization that was founded with a donation from Maryland gubernatorial candidate Robert Ehrlich (R). As far as I'm concerned that made him a member of the Democratic Party by Contribution. That invalidated his campaign. Maryland already had their democratic primary and choose Lt. Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (daughter of RFK.)But any way this very effectively allowed the Republicans to use the Democrat brand against the Democratic Candidate. They painted her as a Carpetbagger with Ehrlich as the Hometown boy. This was very effective. So be looking on for it on the National front. This is why. Robert Ehrlich's Lt. Governor candidate was Michael Steele (R) now the GOP chairman. Guess who they are trying to paint as the carpetbagger from Kenya? Yep, President Obama. So if your looking for insight into the GOP national Strategy. You need to go over the Maryland Governors race between Robert Ehrlich(R) and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (D) with a fine tooth comb. We need to be ready to defend against piracy of our trademark by Republicans. They have destroyed their own brand. Now they have hired Mike Steele to hijack and destroy our brand. That would be a much easier way to even the playing field than Republicans suddenly sprouting morals and ethics.

This is also why I say, Here in Maryland we are so Democratic even our Republicans run as Democrats. Because that's exactly what Ehrlich and Steele did. They Hijacked our brand and ran with it and on it. They became Maryland first Republican Governor and Lt. Governor in 30 years. It's VERY effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anti-choice Democrats are bad enough
but anti-contraception is taking the "big tent" crap way too far.

I'm really beginning to regret the time and money I've spent on the Democrats for the last 37 years (except for the time & money on Wellstone's campaigns). :banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have been saying birth control was the next target.
The Southern Baptists have joined the Catholics and they now call birth control murder.

"The Southern Baptist Convention is reacting after News 8 showed a message from a Southern Baptist preacher teaching Fort Worth seminary students that the birth control pill equals murder.

In a controversial sermon to students at the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Dr. Thomas White, acting as the student services vice president this month, preached that birth control is murder and called attempts at family planning selfish.

"Some of you are involved in that exact same sin," he said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. And anytime that you or others point this out, there is much
derision and ridicule. Talk2action and theocracywatch are two sources that I can think of off of the top of my head who have documented that birth control is the next target.

I suppose that it's a 'blessing in disguise' that I'm old enough that birth control isn't a problem for me, but I get concerned about younger women, and the sane younger men who want no part of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Most Catholics use birth control
Just the way the birthrate has dropped in my family from my parent's generation to mine is proof of that (unless my 22 cousins all have fertility issues).

It's just the wing nut ones (so often men it seems) that yell about it and get all the attention. They also yell about the "cafeteria" Catholics who ignore what the Church says on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
50. This has always been their agenda
Your choice is celibacy or having 16 kids. That is the way these folks have always wanted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. These people hate women why else would they do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. They want women in submissive roles apparently.
And that is going backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. That doesn't make sense because Bob Casey Jr is one and he has supported Birth Control
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bob_Casey

Casey is also more supportive of birth control than his father was as governor. Indeed, in the Archdiocese survey, Casey expressed support for "requiring employers or health insurance plans to cover contraceptives in their prescription drug plans". He also stated his support for "a provision in the state’s budget to fund contraceptive services." <20> Casey's views on this extend to the federal funding of contraception, which he also supports. However, Casey also opposes laws that would "force pharmacists to fill a prescription contrary to their moral beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Don't know. They are working with congress to get bills passed.
So maybe Ryan took a strong stand about a bill and irritated Kristen Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Casey's attitude about abortion has always been 'there's enough laws'
but I do like the concept that many of these people are also anti-death penalty and some oppose the war too (Which is true for Casey). Although we may not like his stance on abortion, at least he isn't a hypocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Democrats for Theocracy is more like it
And bad theocracy at that. The Bible is clearly pro-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Theocracy....we are on our way.
When women are controlled by religious law, more is coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. OK, I agree with you on this thread
These Dems are worse than many Repulicans.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you.
That's the first time anyone has agreed with me today. Not my day.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Mother Jones has more on this topic.
Compromise for Condoms

Those hoping for compromise on the issue suffered a setback yesterday when Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH) was "booted" from Democrats for Life, the anti-choice arm of the Democratic Party, for sponsoring legislation that would have supported the use of contraception to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies.

In a statement last week, Ryan said, "I can't figure out for the life of me how to stop pregnancies without contraception. Don't be mad at me for wanting to solve the problem."

As Atrios writes, Ryan's effort seems like a good faith attempt to find common ground on the abortion issue, but the anti-choice movement proved once again that it is against "any sex without a good chance of 'consequences' for the woman taking part."

Neither health care reform bill in the House or Senate mentions abortion explicitly. But the discussion raises a larger question about DC compromise on social issues. Since he began his campaign for president more than two years ago, Barack Obama has been consistent in advocating "common ground" on divisive issues like abortion. But the anti-choice rejection of contraception indicates that common ground on this particular issue may be impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kristen Day and Catholics online are viciously going after Tim Ryan.
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 12:27 AM by madfloridian
This is really getting ugly.

From Catholics online:

Democrats for Life: Congressman Ryan Losing His Way?

Those arrogant theocrats!! He stands up for the right to birth control, votes for an abortion bill and they say he is losing his way.


Kristen Day, Executive Director of Democrats for Life of America, is the author of "Democrats for Life: Pro-Life Politics and the Silenced Majority."

File this one under “timing is everything in politics.” A recent Ohio poll showed that 64.2 percent of Ohioans strongly oppose public funding of abortion. Another 5.8 percent somewhat disagreed with that practice.

At the same time this poll was being conducted, Ohio Congressman Tim Ryan, an alleged pro-life Democrat, voted to support a bill to allow public funding of abortion. This is either unlucky timing for Congressman Ryan or a clear illustration of a politician abandoning the base that helped elect him to his current office.

It’s no secret that Congressman Ryan is very politically ambitious and has his eyes set on a statewide office in the near future. So maybe he’s proactively abandoning his pro-life roots in hopes of sliding his hands into the deep pockets of the national pro-choice donor base. Maybe he made a mistake and didn’t realize he was voting for taxpayer funded abortions.

Either way, he has made a serious political misstep.

There was a time when pro-life Democrats were proud of Congressman Ryan.


This is vicious. This group means business. They have folks on the faith-based council also. Making inroads.

They will win the battle because they dare to get tough. Most of us around here just say don't make waves....get the health bill through without abortion rights if necessary.

This proves birth control is next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Holy crap...
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 11:24 AM by redqueen
What is their problem with contraception? Is it a religious thing? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes, it is a religious thing.
The Baptists are just really getting into the warnings on birth control. Some leaders are for it, some not. It's religion based politics, and they are an active group with many Democrats...some in name only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I made the mistake of assuming anti-choice dems would be sane.
I had no idea they were religious nuts.

Fucking hell.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. DFLA speaks: they take "no stand" on contraception.
That is the problem.

I guess they are getting some heat.

http://www.democratsforlife.org/

"CONTRACEPTION CLARIFICATION

"DFLA does not take a position on contraception. Despite rumors to the contrary, we do not oppose contraception. We believe that preventing pregnancy is an important part of reducing the abortion rate in America. There are several ways to address prevention, but there is no clear consensus because of ethical, religious or personal reasons.

We are focused on helping pregnant women carry their pregnancies to term and making sure that families have affordable health care, a living wage and the means to support their children during the pregnancy and beyond. The Pregnant Women Support Act, introduced by Congressman Lincoln Davis (D-TN) and Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) will support these goals."

I gathered in the OP that Ryan had been working on the Pregnant Women Support Act

That proposal fails to mention contraception.

By taking no stand in the legislation they are trying to pass, they are hurting women. Not opposing something but not supporting the right.....it IS taking a stand against women's rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. They are not dems, I realize we are a big party but that is one issue
that I will not bargain with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I was reading the 95 10 initiative description. They mention religion
as a reason they don't include contraception in that bill.

And religion should not even be considered when giving women the rights they deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evangelical_Atheist Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
47. Kinda like the Stabbin' Cabin Republicans
They don't want 'em, either.

solecisms are intentional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is good...
...God, Monty Python always got it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Heh heh
That's it exactly.

:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's outrageous!
It's time we get as outspoken as those wackos. Why don't we ever say, loud and clear, that NOT using contraception when a pregnancy would be disastrous is immoral? Because it is. One can understand kids getting carried away in the moment--or even adults "taking a chance" once a while (against their better judgment), but labeling contraception as sinful is insane. We should even be making ad hominem (ad feminem?) arguments, maybe, saying "Well, maybe she doesn't need to use it (Kirsten Whoever) because who'd want to make babies with her anyway?" Dirty pool, perhaps but the rabid religious right uses such tactics all the time.

While we're at it, I consider the lifestyle the Duggars push to be immoral too. Children aren't "arrows in a quiver" to bloat up the father's ego and importance. They're human beings who're put in parents' care for a little while, and if you have so many, it's almost impossible to treat them as individuals. It's no accident that Europeans have become much less eager to wage war, since their average birthrate has dropped to one or two children per couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Excellent rant. Thanks for that.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. JMHO: You can be "anti-abortion" in your personal life and call yourself
a Democrat. You CANNOT oppose reproductive choice including birth control for all women and call yourself a Democrat. Such a stance, in support of religious fascism, is fundamentally incompatible with Democratic policies. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. agreed--sort of like joining the NACP and spporting slavery
sometimes the big tent is really no tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Saying "I'm a Democrat" really doesn't mean anything anymore.
Because it can mean everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. How effing stupid....remark from the Family Research Council blog.
These people have so much tunnel vision they scare me to death.

http://www.frcblog.com/2009/07/are-some-members-of-congress-just-d-u-m-b/

"Are Some Members of Congress Just D-U-M-B?

..."But this quote from Rep. Ryan in a LifeNews.com article about the split with Democrats for Life really jumped out at me: “I can’t figure out for the life of me how to stop pregnancies without contraception.”

Really? He “can’t figure it out”? Not “for the life of” him?

Perhaps Rep. Ryan is under the impression that engaging in sexual relations is mandatory. It’s not. Perhaps he thinks people will die if they don’t have sex. They won’t—but thousands die each year (of sexually transmitted diseases) because they do.

If Rep. Ryan “can’t figure out . . . how to stop pregnancies without contraception,” let me spell it out for him.

A-B-S-T-A-I-N."

Narrowminded bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Well, what about all of those married couples? Since the
sanctity of marriage is such a big deal with them. I don't know sane married couples who want the risk of pregnancy just because they want to make love - neither the woman nor the man. So no one is to ever be able to have sex again? And forget about it, anal sex is also a sin to these freaks, so I suppose no one will be having sexual relations, married or otherwise?

They're not narrowminded bigots, they're part of what I refer to as the religiously insane and how they trick sane religious people to go along with their insanity I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. You can't have it both ways
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 06:45 PM by Libertas1776
you assholes. Either you let people get abortions or you greatly limit the number of abortions performed by letting people practice safe responsible sex with contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancies from happening in the first place. Oh but they can't agree to that. That proposition is much too logical, practical, and responsible and isn't crazy and reactionary enough for their liking. They prefer that people just don't have sex. Yeah that's gonna happen. Dems for Life my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edc Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. On the Right
Any group that pushes the Democratic Party farther right is very dangerous. Such groups are always well funded and organized by right wing interests. The goal is to eventually have a single Reich party two headed hydra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes, they are well-funded and powerful.
I am concerned that DU and other forums are backing off the issue of women's rights....like it is assumed they will be compromised and okay with it.

We are not being activist in our own party for women. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. !!THIS is why I use the term birth control & not choice!!
I have been hearing what the fundies have been saying to each other for years, & yes they really are turning against ALL bc, putting it all under their 'umbrella' word: abortion. PLEASE side with me on this, & fight their 19th Century view of women & children.
http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html
http://www.scripturecatholic.com/contraception.html

http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/geocentric.shtml
http://www.religioustolerance.org/lfe_bibl.htm for Old Testament Christians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. for that lie of 7 hills perpetrated by those on the Right
http://www.musesrealm.net/rome/sevenhills.html Long before these Prayer Warriors were even born, stealing from other religions/philosophies & then turning & "damning" them & outlawing them.....we need to stand firmly together AGAINST living like it's 1 A.D.

..."Of Early Rome:
Cermalus
Cispius
Fagutal
Oppius
Palatium
Sucusa
Velia

Of Later Rome:
Aventinus (Aventine)
Caelius (Caelian)
Capitolium (Capitoline)
Esquiliae (Esquiline)
Palatium (Palatine)
Quirinalis (Quirinal)
Viminalis (Viminal)

Though the Capitoline is the only distinct hill today, all seven hills were once discernable. The Quirinal, Viminal, Esquiline, and Caelian hills are really promontories of an ancient volcanic ridge. The Palatine, Aventine, and Capitoline hills were hills separate from the others (not part of the same ancient ridge). There were once marshy ravines between all of the hills, and between the hills and the Tiber River, but these were drained in antiquity and the ravines are now filled in with the remains of civilisation.

Archaeological evidence supports the notion that there were walled cities on each of the seven original hills. It also suggests that there was a wall that surrounded the Palatine, Esquiline, Velian, and Caelian hills but left out the Capitoline, Quirinal, and Viminal hills.

Historians and Archaeologists have found evidence of ancient enmity between peoples living on the Quirinal and Esquiline hills against those on the Velian and Palatine hills. This could help explain the reasons for choosing Remus and Romulus as leaders of the warring peoples living on the Aventine and Palatine hills respectively"....
Talk 2 Action is a tremendous help in tracking this various groups & noting the changes they're pushing for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxintexas Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
36. To MadFloridian
Hi MadFlo, this is Max from Progressive Puppy. I'd like to ask you about something but I don't have enough posts yet to send a PM through this forum. Would you please contract me via email through my blog? Tomorrow will be fine, or whenever it's convenient. Thanks! mx :]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Hi. Love your blog. Will email you tomorrow or next day.
You do a good job.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amos Moses Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sounds like we've got a Sarah of our own in Kirsten Day.
:puke:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lexanman Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
42. These people are not about birth control
or abortion. They are about controlling and subjugating women to second class citizens. They are not Democrats. They slander the name with their hatefulness and ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. Here's how to stop this shit:
Every DU member should call, fax and email the DNC, the DCCCC and the equivalent Senate campaign fundraising group.

Tell them you will not give another penny until the party publicly pledges to never give another penny to any candidate who is anti-choice or who does not pledge in writing to support the party platform. If you don't support the platform you're not a Democrat, period.

As for how to handle those pro-life Dems already elected, here's the answer:

The Democratic Party needs to tell these fake-Dems that they will not receive a single penny for reelection, nor any party support, unnless they vote with their party on bills where it counts. Starting with the healthcare bill. No blocking this important legislation because of your personal fixation with controlling women's bodies, period. Anyone who votes against Democratic values when their votes are needed for passage will have a well-funded primary challenger backed by the Democratic Party, period.

Republicans did this in California to maintain their blockade of any sane budget. No new taxes - or members would lose all party funding and support.

Dems need to stand up for what's right, weed out these bad apples, and demand that ayone with a D after their name support the party platform - especially those sections guaranteed individual rights, and most especially women's reproductive freedoms because lives are very clearly at stake here. I know, speaking as someone once diagnosed with a tubal pregnancy. If the tube bursts before an abortion is performed, you are likely to die. Right to "life" would kill the 1 in 50 to 100 women in America who are diagnosed with a tubal pregnancy - a condition, incidentally, in which their is no "baby" to save, since the fetus is only a few weeks old and dies, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chasitynola Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. This is just toooo much.
So, you are pro-life, ok. I can respect your opinion. Although I am staunchly a pro-choice woman (NOT pro-abortion people), we need reason here!!! I am blown away, day after day, with people that take this stance.

I am, and forever will be, a loyal supporter of Planned Parenthood. I am tired of 'Biblical teachings' making women second class citizens.

My hubs does read the Bible. He loves to study religion. But he tells me all of the time that he doesn't want to be 'head of household'! He would rather leave that up to me! Contraception = Murder??? Where do these people come from, for chrissakes?

I am at a total loss here. I cannot even express my feelings with any clarity because I am brain-scrambled by all of this insanity.

If pro-lifers want to limit abortions, why in the hell don't they understand that preventing pregnancy is the best way to accomplish this goal? It is human nature to be sexual! And the same people that want to protect the fetuses do NOT want to help the women that make the decision to keep their child even though they cannot handle it. 'No handouts, here, Missy! You did this yourself! We're behind you 100% to make you bring this child to term and once it breathes its first breath, you're on your OWN!'

I am floundering here because I am at a loss with this whole debacle...!

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. 2 things-1, did anyone else notice how few women were on that letter
list?

And 2, Rep. Ryan is kind of cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. Reducing abortions while simultaneously failing to support contraception?
That's crazy talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
49. For the longest time I saw the title of the thread and wondered who was kicking people
out of the Democratic Party and how they would enforce a lifelong ban. lol


I had never heard of these nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC