|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:36 PM Original message |
Why did Nixon go to China? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. To get to the other side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imdjh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. dim sum nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. For the same reason the chicken cross the road??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because he felt it was the right thing to do for U.S. foreign policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nixon had a huge ego. China represented a huge market. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Cheap labor market n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamuti Lotus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. primarily, to fuck over the Russians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cigsandcoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamuti Lotus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. the balance of power in South Asia should also be considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because it was there. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. He was the target of a Chinese Plan to Modernize China and not paying for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because "Only Nixon could have gone to China" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. Watergate diversion....actually he was gearing up for re-election.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. I remember someone saying 'only Nixon could go to China' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
14. To do that opera. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. Well, it was 1972...but to answer your question, smart diplomacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. Google Nixon China Trip and/or diplomacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obliviously (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-26-09 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nixon was not really a conservative in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC