|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:41 PM Original message |
Okay, who will be honest and admit that you replied to one of the Palin divorce threads ......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tangerine LaBamba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. Does this count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. A young Golda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. What do you mean "as if?" We don't know one way or another. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. I did and to several of them. "We don't have all the facts yet." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's untrue JUST because her spokesperson "officially" said so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. "why in the world should we start taking Palin at her word NOW???" QFT. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. not me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inchworm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. I did a Brady Bunch thread instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Ah .... right on cue ..... the chickenshit, jerkoff, cowardly, anonymous unrec brigade strikes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. begging for recs is so demeaning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. You grossly misunderstand ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. Since the recs are also anonymous, are they included in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. No, and for obvious reasons, if you stop to actually think about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. On the first page of GD, without much searching, I found one thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Okay, I'll try this again since you seem to be having a problem with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. There is no problem here. But let me help you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Do you work at obtuseness? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
44. I AGREE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. Does that include those who were debunking the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Nah.... debunkers are always welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. confessed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think I need to get out of the lounge more often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Oh, yeah, I responded to several, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lifelong Protester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
15. I only 'looked', does that count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. Only to enjoy a little time pondering.... who among the RW powerhouses, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbeyco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. God dog - you should have put a warning on your post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think I withheld judgement as to the facts... but it didn't stop me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. I opened this one. Won't even open one of the others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
19. All I have done until this moment was to systematically Unrec every one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. After the CBS story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. I checked and found no corroboration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. You and I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbeyco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. Nope, won't comment on the speculative threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. I admit to not caring whether if the rumor is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
26. Didn't, but only because I was late to the party. I freely admit to endlessly discussing Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curtland1015 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
27. I didn't. I was waiting for one of the "major" news sources to confirm it before I believed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lukasahero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
30. I 'cluck clucked' over the asshole who suggested men now had a shot at 'it'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
31. I've kinda always suspected they had marital problems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
32. Is there a PROBLEM with responding to a PALIN-ostophy?11 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. "Problem"? No. Why do you ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Because YOU asked. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I never said it was a problem. YOU did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
34. Oly to parody the Birther paranoia. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
42. nope.... probably though, only cause i have had people here all day yacking at me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JitterbugPerfume (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. I said oh goody Palin gossip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueamy66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
46. I responded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-01-09 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
48. I didn't respond to any. Does that make me special? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-02-09 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
49. I typed up a "new rumor" but decided not to post it. Probably good judgment on my part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC