Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HOPE in the tea leaves for Justice SOTOMAYOR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:27 AM
Original message
HOPE in the tea leaves for Justice SOTOMAYOR
Yip to Senator FEINGOLD's saying that the confirmation hearings for SCotUS have become useless theater. Devoid of content that will tell us who they are and what they will do as justices. Justice SOUTER was great, but there is always that mirror possibility that a supposed one-of-ours will turn out to be one-of-theirs.

So here's a tidbit that, hope against hope, portends what Justice SOTOMAYOR will be?

Well, there have been other little signs---like nearly ALL Rethugs voting against her, NRA in their paranoid panic.

We need THREE more to have a little breather.

I couldn't find the sculpture cited.

**********QUOTE********
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08032009/gossip/pagesix/sightings_182718.htm
SIGHTINGS

JUDGE Sonia Sotomayor admiring Elliott Arkin'ssculpture of Obama, titled "Hope," in the office of White House counsel Jeffrey Bleich.







http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/features/finch/finch10-3-08.asp
The Barackites chose a complex Arkin rendition of Obama pushing a boulder labelled "Hope" up a mountain, while Lincoln, Dr. King and Jack Kennedy look on approvingly from the sky, a fitting metaphor for the problems Obama will face as president.

********UNQUOTE********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. All confirmation hearings since Bork have become theatre with none of the candidates
revealing anything because they know if they do that some yahoo senator could use it to derail there confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. The chances of her not winning confirmation are epsilon-ishly small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. As I said, it's not the confirmation I'm worried about, it's the blank slate
that the hearings leave about what the confirmed person will turn out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the Alito one was really BAD theatre...
The Republicans were shameful and The Democrats rolled over and said "Oh, please don't hurt us!" and when his wife did her little boo-hoo-hooing show that was THE WORST.

McCain says he "still on the fence" about Sotomayor.
Hey dirt-bag, who gives a shit what you think, except the Sunday morning "news" shows every other week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. She'll be very conservative
on the rights of the accused and deferential to government/corporate power. Don't be shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Holy ZEUS!1 Do you *know* something?!1 That's what I'm afraid of!1
Well, that and Choice and all manner of things!1


What this system comes down to is winning big majority margins and putting in nominees WITHOUT REGARD to "bipartisanship."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Voted against the government 2% of the time
in criminal appeals and when she was on an appellate panel with Republican appointees she voted with them 97% of the time. Granted there are some constraints on circuit courts that obviously the Supreme Court does not have. Still, I think you can see a pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-03-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. O.K., thanks. That was my point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC