Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is time to start giving progressive activists as much attention as we give the Teabaggers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:13 AM
Original message
It is time to start giving progressive activists as much attention as we give the Teabaggers
As a person who has been involved in a good amount of political activism I know how difficult it is to get the media to pay any attention to what progressive activists are doing to bring about change. Not only does the corporate media ignore the work that progressives are doing in the community, but it seems that even progressive blogs dedicate very little time to covering the work of citizen activists who are out there every single day trying to move this country in a better direction.

Why is it that progressive activists are largely ignored while the Teabaggers and Birthers are able to sustain national media coverage? Even progressive blogs seem to have given the Birther movement far more coverage than I ever remember them giving to the progressive activists on our own side and I find this very troubling. I understand that the Birthers are so obviously delusional that it can be very entertaining to poke fun at them, but the fact is that Orly Taitz has absolutely no chance of succeeding at convincing the courts that her forged Kenyan birth certificate is real. Why is it that the citizen activism of a crazy right-wing dentist is able to get more coverage from progressive blogs than activists on our own side who have had a far bigger impact than Taitz will ever hope to have? Why can’t we give people like Medea Benjamin, Ann Wright, Kathy Kelly, Coleen Rowley, Naomi Wolf, and the many other citizen activists who have taken a stand on important issues as much publicity as we give to Orly Taitz?

Probably the biggest failure of the progressive movement is that we have not been very good at inspiring people on our side of the issues to walk away from the computer and get involved in their communities. We need to hear the stories of progressive activists so we can inspire others to follow in their footsteps, and because the corporate media does not want us to get involved they are not likely to start giving us additional coverage unless they are under a lot of pressure to do so. This means that it is up to us to get these stories out there.

Please go out into your communities and engage in civic action and then come back here and write about your experiences. Tell us about the challenges you faced, tell us about the people who inspired you to overcome those challenges, tell us about any victories you had no matter how big or how small those victories were, and most importantly tell us what we can do to help bring about change.

If you want to continue to write about Orly Taitz and the Teabaggers that is fine, it is important to raise awareness of what the opposition is doing so it is good to have some stories about their actions. What I would like to see however is for every person who writes about the Teabaggers to also dedicate themselves to writing at least one piece about progressive activists for every story they write about right-wing activists. While there is nothing wrong with attacking the other side, we need to put more focus into building up our own side so that we can inspire more people to get out there and make change happen. Democracy begins with you, so please go out there and get involved so that the next time you write about the Teabaggers you will be able to tell us what you did to publicly challenge those Teabaggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's because our views are harmful to the status quo but keeping their
crazy ideas out there, it is well known that there are many who will believe it if its shown on TV. This way the corporate controlled media get to keep us down and keep the right in the spotlight. It has been this way for a long time. We are laughed at and ignored, they are allowed too much coverage and respect as if their stories are legit. Our stories have to be debunked least the public become too aware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think you are right, but it is up to us to change that.
The internet gives each and every one of us the power to report on the things that the corporate media won't report on, and it also gives us the opportunity to point out the sorts of disparities in mass media coverage that you mention.

You are correct as well in your analysis that no matter how crazy a theory is it will gain followers if it is mentioned on television. Coverage of the Teabaggers and the Birthers does not help our cause in the slightest, even critical coverage has the potential to gain them some followers. That doesn't mean we can completely ignore them, we do need to challenge their propaganda but we need to make sure we aren't letting them control the story. If in challenging them we end up talking about their causes more than our own causes however then that is a serious problem and we need to work to fix that problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. You are so right but as soon as we change the subject the cameras go off.
There are lots of people on the net getting the word out and that has made a huge difference. We are slowly being heard but not in the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have certainly seen the cameras get turned off on many occasions...
I think it is time that people really start demanding more from the media, when they bury important stories or lie to us we should be outside their offices picketing. They can turn their cameras off but when they do turn them off we need to go straight to the public and show them what is being suppressed. We may not have much money to get the message out, but if people participate it is possible for just a few of them to have a big impact without spending hardly anything, I have seen it happen more than once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. "There is no legitimate justification for the amount of coverage these tiny crowds received."
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 12:05 PM by dorkulon
Of course, there has always been a crazy left, too. The difference is that they never got the kind of media attention that these teabagging faux populists have. In fact, regular, not-crazy liberals still don't get this kind of attention. There were truly grassroots demonstrations against the Iraq invasion, involving not hundreds, but hundreds of thousands. But they never received even a hundredth of the press coverage these ridiculous tea parties did. In fact, they were ignored as much as possible, to the point of implausibility.

The highest estimate I’ve seen for tea party turnout, the one cited by Michelle Malkin and other conservative ideologues with an obvious desire to inflate the numbers as much as possible, is 250,000 nationwide, at 800 events. First of all, that makes for an average of 312 people per event. Second, 250,000 people is fewer than showed up at a single anti-war rally in DC before the Iraq invasion, which received nothing like the press coverage these ridiculous tea parties did. Guess how many people showed for the DC tea party? 3,000. Three fucking thousand. That’s your big scary tax revolt, after weeks of promotion on cable news.

I want to emphasize this point again. Even former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, whose FreedomWorks non-profit coordinated the tea parties, said on Meet the Press that there were “over 800 tea parties around the country, with attendance in the hundreds.” Get that? That’s hundreds. The largest congregation of teabaggers of all was in the largest southern capitol, Atlanta, numbering 15,000.

Folks, these numbers aren’t modest; they are completely pathetic. 15,000 white people isn’t a people’s movement; it’s a Rush concert. In other cities, the protests drew fewer people than a good street magician. There is no legitimate justification for the amount of coverage these tiny crowds received.

The hard right—-people who call guys like Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity “great Americans”—-find themselves suddenly marginalized, powerless, irrelevant. There is a natural radicalization that goes along with this kind of political alienation, and we saw some of this on the left during the Bush years. The difference is that the “loony left” and even the not-so-loony left was almost completely ignored by the press in those years. Even now, the equivalents of these “Obama=Hitler” nutjobs on the left, if there are any, aren’t paid any mind. However, this rapidly dwindling, obviously ignorant, increasingly manic fringe on the right is still somehow a major media focus point.

Why? Maybe it’s because their ostensible message about taxes is one shared by the extremely wealthy, the ones who actually stand to lose something (about 4% of their income) if Obama’s tax plan is implemented. Maybe it’s because the press has been swallowed up by giant conglomerates, which also stand to lose. Of course, it’s sad that there are always a few pawns willing to work on their behalf, but it’s also pretty encouraging just how few of them there are. Despite the best efforts of hugely popular media outlets to confuse the issues and demonize Obama as a fascist socialist America-hater, his approval rating is at 64%. And in an amazing development, the majority of Americans don’t even think their taxes are too high.

It seems that people may finally be wising up to the fraudulent economics of the GOP, despite the corporate press’ best efforts to fool them. Yes, we have a huge debt problem, but we all know whose fault that is. And the only way we will ever pay down that debt is to raise taxes. That’s not fascism; that’s reality.

But reality is the last thing on the teabaggers’ minds. In fact, reality is the enemy. What they want, what they appear to need, is something, anything, that will enable them to deny their own culpability in causing the truly horrific condition this country was in the day Obama was inaugurated and Bush flew away from a crowd of jeering people--a very, very big crowd.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/21614
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for posting that, there are many good points in there
I remember the small protest outside David Letterman's studio by about fifteen Sarah Palin supporters that received major national news coverage. Our side can not get national news coverage unless we can get hundreds of thousands of people and then the coverage is usually focused on police warnings of potential violence even though the protests are almost always peaceful. We can't get good coverage with hundreds of thousands of people, but the teabaggers are able to get national coverage with only fifteen people and that says a lot about whose side the corporate media is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'll never forget how much time CNN spent covering a 200-people "counterprotest" to the
several hundred thousand strong DC protest. They gave this tiny astroturf "pro-troops" group almost equal time. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe that DC protest you refer to may be the same one I was at in January of 2003
I remember there were people as far as the eye could see, it was a group that was obviously in the hundreds of thousands and we were really eager to see the media coverage we received. When we picked up the morning paper however it said there was "about 30,000 people", a number that was a flat out lie as anyone who was there knew that number was far lower than the real number of people. We have all been in stadiums and have seen what 30,000 people looks like, it would take several stadiums to fit the group of people who were in the streets that day and there were hardly any right-wing counter protesters mixed in but those who were there got a great deal of coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Progressive activists aren't always ignored.
Sometimes they're mocked as loonies... or accused of being unpatriotic / traitorous.

Not always ignored... but when they're not, the spin is hardly beneficial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is very true, I protested the RNC last year and the media coverage was very inaccurate
The media still repeats the spin that the protesters at the RNC were out to destroy the city of St. Paul despite the fact that the protesters were almost entirely peaceful and it was the police who were responsible for virtually all of the violent acts. Everyone I have spoke to who marched at the RNC is outraged at the police state they witnessed and they all say that the media coverage was terrible (and I have spoken with many of them as I live in the Twin Cities area and most of my friends marched on the RNC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC