|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 05:29 PM Original message |
Clunker for Clunker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atomic-fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. certainly an unemployed person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indydem (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
armyowalgreens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'm assuming they rounded to 25 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 07:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. why a cutoff at all, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-05-09 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Interesting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. == |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. I wrote on another thread that one of the biggest problems, IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. that's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. As an example... my son was accepted to a a good state college about 40 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Not necessarily. There are many cars still available that missed the "cutoff" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
11. Not about helping poor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:45 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. And you know, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. Not a bad idea.... but what is considered a "better clunker"? 15 MPG? 12? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. isn't the cash for clunker requirement, 9 mpg better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I thought it was: Trade in a less-than-15 MPG for a greater-than-25 MPG vehicle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I believe I'm taking that from a comment from Rachel Maddow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Government site... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. Great idea!...... and as an add-on benefit, employ some out of work techs to refurbish the trade-ins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
20. There are 2 standards (besides the cutoff date) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
22. knr for a great idea n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-06-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
23. Better idea... Bad for WORSE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC