Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Burger King Boots Shoeless Tot, Mom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 03:01 AM
Original message
Burger King Boots Shoeless Tot, Mom
Burger King Boots Shoeless Tot, Mom
Store Apologizes For Ejecting 6-Month-Old Girl for Violating "No Shoes" Policy

(AP) Burger King has apologized to a St. Louis area woman who was told to leave a restaurant because her 6-month-old daughter wasn't wearing shoes.

A spokeswoman for the restaurant chain said Wednesday that workers at the Sunset Hills Burger King took the "no shoes, no shirt, no service" policy too far.

Jennifer Frederich went to the restaurant Sunday along with her mother and Jennifer's 6-month-old daughter, Kaylin. Workers told them to leave because of the shoeless baby, citing a health code violation.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/06/national/main5219581.shtml

No baby shoes, no service

Your mother, your pediatrician, even the Nordstrom salesclerk will tell you that children don't need shoes until they start to walk. It's commonsense that a baby who spends his time in his mother's arms or in a stroller can live wildly and only sport a pair of socks or booties.

But a manager at a Burger King in Missouri thinks differently. He asked a mom and her 6-month-old baby to leave the restaurant because the baby wasn't wearing shoes.

Jennifer Frederich, the baby's mother, shared with CNN, "The manager told me that you can order to-go but you're going to have to leave if she doesn't have shoes on because it's against health code."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=44996#ixzz0NTx7jkQ8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a training issue to me
The manager may have made a poor choice, but was attempting to follow the rules. Perhaps they need more specific training on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. you know, i've never even thought about that for a baby!! my daughter
didn't even own a pair of shoes til she was one, i think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. As if their having creepiest commercials on TV weren't bad enough.
Edited on Fri Aug-07-09 07:17 AM by TexasObserver
Who the hell thinks this plastic, creepy KING on those commercials is amusing?

Worst fast food commercials on TV, by far.

But get that baby outta here!

The mother even put socks on the baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL, I love the King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I suppose "We're Number Five!" wouldn't work, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. BK plays off his creepiness... That explains recent commercials where king shows up in bedrooms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. this is where 'zero-tolerance' thinking leads
we practice it in schools...what should we expect in the 'real world'?

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleet Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Good point.
People need to understand that rules have an intent, and that enforcing a rule with total disregard for that intent is almost always counterproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. I refuse to set foot (or drive-up to) in another Burger King since they stole $5 from my wife.
And repeated attempts to contact their corporate office were ignored.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is what you get when you insist your employees rely ...
... on rules, not judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC