Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Coulter Hoax: How Ann Coulter Exposed the Intelligent Design Movement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 03:56 PM
Original message
The Coulter Hoax: How Ann Coulter Exposed the Intelligent Design Movement
This is a classic... Coulter gets totally punked in it...

http://www.livescience.com/othernews/070407_coulter_hoax.html

Some choice exerpts:

Coulter has very cleverly written a fake criticism of evolution, much like the way NYU physicist Alan Sokal in 1996 published a fake physics article in a literary journal, an affair that has become known as the “Sokal hoax.” A self-proclaimed “old unabashed leftist,” Sokal was disturbed by the sloppily antiscientific, postmodernistic mentality that had started to replace reason and rationality within the academic left and ingeniously made his point by managing to get his nonsense article published by the very people he wished to expose.

-snip-

On occasion, Coulter’s satire is quite esoteric. Such is the case when she states, “Behe disproved evolution—unless evolution is simply a nondisprovable pseudoscience, like astrology.” To understand the subtle linking of Behe to astrology, one must be familiar with Behe’s testimony in the Dover trial in which he had to concede that if intelligent design was accepted as science, one must also accept astrology.

-snip-

As for the fossil record, finally, Coulter bluntly states that it carries “no evidence” and supports this claim by jokingly referring to the authority of a Phillip Johnson, who is a lawyer!


Much more at the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is such a joke. I almost laugh at her. Thank you for this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just doing my part to lighten the mood around here...
Seems kind of heavy lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny stuff.
I love the last paragraph.
In conclusion, Coulter has written a biting satire over the trend of anti-intellectualism that clouds part of the conservative ideology, which is otherwise based on principle and reason. If I have any objection to Coulter’s piece, it would be that it is a bit lengthy, but perhaps this too is part of the satire, as some antievolution pieces tend to be pretty verbose. There are also some things I don’t fully understand, for example several references to bestiality and some seemingly nonsequitur remarks about Cher and Elton John. Considering how wonderfully multilayered Coulter’s writing is, I am sure there is a perfectly logical explanation.
Coulter's writing is "wonderfully multilayered". :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. "Multilayered-"
The excrement floats on top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. That Ann is such a hoot
:evilgrin: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PreacherCasey Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good stuff. It's nice to see these silly arguments exposed to the light from a solid mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. She would just end up calling
Peter Olofsson a fag. She's a mean and hateful person that says whatever she thinks will get a reaction. I think the less people pay attention to her, the more likely she will just melt away into the woodwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Conservatism is self-satire
How can you tell the difference between a "real conservative" and someone pretending to be a conservative as satire? When Colbert first started lots of conservatives actually thought he was "one of them". You can't make this stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ann Coulter = Tony Clifton
Andy? Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
49jim Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. I caught Coulter on
Faux last night as I was flipping the channels......she called Imus a liberal..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Was that where she made her Darfur comments?
Something about how only the Africans couldn't get a genocide right. Truly despicable. It made the OP/ED pages of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC