|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
TheCoxwain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:33 AM Original message |
Question on pre-existing condition provision in the current health care bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalkydem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. It has to be close to the price for others - but I don't know what "close" means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RDANGELO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. The only thing they can have higher primiums for is age, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCoxwain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I dont think they should be allowed to price risk ...with only exception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Thanks for dispelling the disinfo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Do you know where that is stated in one of the bills? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-15-09 07:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Whoopie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-15-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Yes. A diabetic 62 year old will pay the same premium as a healthy 62 year old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-16-09 06:16 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Fuck that straight to hell. There is no reason why age should be a factor at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Do you know where that is stated in one of the bills? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Section 113 of HR3200 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Just to save time & thank you! It looks to me like the bill addresses the OP's concerns, IMHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. There are those "buzzwords" again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. And, of course, all of this could be prevented by simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. +1 The manufactured chaos is working for both sides. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. You deserve the "plus one" as It took you six words to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks for posting that, my thoughts exactly. I am hoping it is covered in point 2 of yesterday's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-14-09 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. There is no final bill, but according this House summary of their bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC