Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Official: "Sebelius Misspoke."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:36 PM
Original message
Administration Official: "Sebelius Misspoke."
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 09:45 PM by andym
http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/administration_official_sebelius_misspoke.php

An administration official said tonight that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius "misspoke" when she told CNN this morning that a government run health insurance option "is not an essential part" of reform. This official asked not to be identified in exchange for providing clarity about the intentions of the President. The official said that the White House did not intend to change its messaging and that Sebelius simply meant to echo the president, who has acknowledged that the public option is a tough sell in the Senate and is, at the same time, a must-pass for House Democrats, and is not, in the president's view, the most important element of the reform package.

A second official, Linda Douglass, director of health reform communications for the administration, said that President Obama believed that a public option was the best way to reduce costs and promote competition among insurance companies, that he had not backed away from that belief, and that he still wanted to see a public option in the final bill. "Nothing has changed.," she said. "The President has always said that what is essential that health insurance reform lower costs, ensure that there are affordable options for all Americans and increase choice and competition in the health insurance market. He believes that the public option is the best way to achieve these goals."

A third White House official, via e-mail, said that Sebelius didn't misspeak. "The media misplayed it," the third official said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am glad they corrected her...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok guys.... could everybody unsnarl their knickers now?. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. just in time - I had the noose over the chandlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. LOL.....
grantcart.....you just crack me up...:rofl:

thanks for the belly laugh which brought much
needed relief from the tensions of the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Don't be hatin' the moose by tossing them over the chandelier
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 10:24 PM by cliffordu
their antlers shrivel from the heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazy_vanilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. hold on, an official statement is needed
Who is this "mystery WH official"? Could've been my grandma for all I know ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck, she did she do it again?
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 09:52 PM by Cha
I seem to remember her doing that before on something that had activists all in a dither.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I can't take this anymore. First up, then down, he's great, he's evil. I'm throwing in the towel.
:rofl:

Hell No!

Waddabucnhabullshit!

:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. "I'm never going to vote again"111111111
:rofl:

:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sibelius should know better
Come on kathleen, I was hoping to vote for you come 2016
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good to hear. K&R
I have to admit that I have been getting a little nervous, but I have been trying not to freak out at all of the bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. well, this is a strong statement
From someone who 'asked not to be identified'.

Does anyone in this administration know which end is up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. "and is not, in the president's view, the most important element of the reform package."
That's what we have been talking about. Actually a public option really is necessary for real change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. However, I don't like the point of "not the most important element"
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 09:42 PM by andym
I think it should be seen as one of the make or break elements.... On the other hand they are saying it is essential, so.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. "An administration official"
We have Sebelius on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Now that this little tempest in a teapot has subsided . . .

Forward to Health Care Reform!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dont start dancing just yet
"the president, who has acknowledged that the public option is a tough sell in the Senate and is, at the same time, a must-pass for House Democrats, and is not, in the president's view, the most important element of the reform package."

So its NOT important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That doesn't say it's not important, it says it's not the MOST
important element in the reform package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I wouldn't say it's not important, but Obama seems to have his eye elsewhere
Specifically, he seems to expound a lot on the importance of banning exclusions for pre-existing conditions and restricting the imposition of yearly or lifetime caps on care. If I was going to bet, I'd say Obama believes those are the most important aspects of reform. That isn't to say he doesn't believe a public option is or is not important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. After all, it was ONLY Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius who said it.
But now we have an anonymous official who is going on the unofficial record correcting her "misstatement".

Puhlease.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, it looks like the Administration heard us. That's good.
Edited on Sun Aug-16-09 09:50 PM by Laelth
But I am none too pleased with this response. What does this person mean by saying the public option is not the most important element of the reform package? I thought the President said the public option was essential to keep the insurance companies honest and to drive down costs?

I still read all this as the Administration backing away, albeit slowly, from the public option.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hey, mistakes were made.
Mandatory private health insurance for all. Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. So now the sky isn't falling?
I think the DU front page needs a color coded health care reform threat level indicator. That way I can know whether or not to panic with just a glance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. What sky? There is no sky, and it wouldn't be falling even if there was...
Trial balloon? Flat-footed blunder? Addle-headed blathering? Who knows.

Far too many people are in far too much of a hurry to get in a dither of outrage to either proclaim themselves correct or deeply wronged in a diva-like swoon.

Not the tightest operation, though, and that's not a reassuring sign...

Let's see how it all develops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. There is not going to be..
.... a "public option" and I wonder what it would take for some of you morons to read between the fucking lines.

When Obama says "not the most important part" that means he is not pushing for it, he does not think he can get it and it is not happening.

Get a clue already, Obama has caved to the corps at every opportunity, that's not going to change now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Too late. My local Faux teevee news just showed her throwing in the towel.
They're gonna show it again at 3am, 4:30am, 5am, 6am, 7am, 8am, 11am, 5pm, 6pm, 10pm, ...

Count on it.

Was the WH fire department sleeping late on a Sunday morning? Or?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicago legal pro Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Who is the "administration official"?
Convenient how he/she says Sebelius misspoke but he can't be identified for any follow up. The other administration official says she didn't misspeak. The media just didn't understand her. Right - don't believe your ears believe us. Sure Obama is "for" a public option. But he is signaling he will sign a bill without it. "The best I could get folks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC