Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Grassroots' Freedom Works (HCR forum disruptors) paid Armey $400,000 for part-time job

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 03:40 PM
Original message
'Grassroots' Freedom Works (HCR forum disruptors) paid Armey $400,000 for part-time job
Reporting by Lindsay Beyerstein of majikthise.com:


http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2009/08/grassroots-freedom-works-paid-armey-400000-for-parttime-job.html

By Lindsay Beyerstein, developing...

Former House Majority Leader turned lobbyist Dick Armey resigned from the lobbying firm of DLA Piper on Friday amid criticism of his leadership role in FreedomWorks, one of the main right wing groups organizing town hall mobs against health care reform.

Armey probably wasn't spending that much time at DLA Piper anyway. Armey earned a total of $400,000 from FreedomWorks and the FreedomWorks Foundation during the 2007 tax year, according to tax records. The records say that Armey was putting in 36 hours per week at Freedom Works and the Freedom Works Foundation. (This is original reporting. Please support Majikthise by crediting.)

One wonders whether Armey had much time left over for his lobbying clients at DLA Piper that year, which included pharma giant Sanofi-Aventis and the Medicines Co.. Armey represented Sanofi again in 2008 and continued to represent the Medicines Co. through 2009.

The former Republican congressman told Politico he was resigning because he didn't want his lobbying clients to face media scrutiny for their association with FreedomWorks.

FreedomWorks has been accused of laying down astroturf at town halls. The protesters are real people, but the town hall protests are organized by Freedom Works and other groups underwritten by industries with a financial stake in derailing healthcare reform.

Defenders say there's nothing wrong with grassroots organizing. Grassroots groups often make common cause with other interested parties, including corporations. However, it's telling that Armey thinks his clients need to be shielded from criticism of FreedomWorks, as if were something shameful.

Pro-reform, pro-Democratic groups like the SEIU, ACORN, MoveOn, and Organizing for America proudly identify themselves at town hall meetings. They make no secret of the fact that they are part of a national movement with powerful institutional backers.

Nor is it a secret that big pharma and big insurance have given heavily to influential Democrats like Max Baucus over the years. Hedging your bets is a grand old tradition in Washington. The way things are going, the money to Democrats may turn out to have been better-spent. At least it's out in the open.

Whereas, the backers of the town hall mobs are trying to paint these gatherings as spontaneous, organic uprisings as opposed to what they really are, events coordinated by Washington insiders on behalf of corporate clients.

Why wouldn't pharmaceutical and insurance companies be proud to stand with patriotic Americans against government-administered health insurance? Probably because protesters at town hall meetings are saying and doing things that no "respectable" lobbyist would want to associate with his clients.

Like the town hall attendee in New Hampshire who recommended sending immigrants home with a bullet in the head, or right wing TV personality Glenn Beck who draws parallels between Obama's health care reform efforts and Nazi eugenics. Beck is promoting FreedomWorks' 9/12 DC march on his show and heading up his own 912 Project.

This is all protected speech, of course. However, if corporations and lobby shops are funding and facilitating these types of actions, they need to be held accountable for what's happening. Any demonstration can attract the odd extremist, but these town hall meetings have established an ongoing pattern of ugly, disruptive behavior.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wrong!
He made $500,000.



Lobbyist Dick Armey's "Freedom Works" Is Orchestrating HC Riots on Behalf of His Corporate Clients


http://hisvorpal.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/mannix-freedo... /

==snip==

From their OTHER 2006 tax return (That was FreedomWorks FOUNDATION, this is from FreedomWorks, Inc.), the following are listed as “Related Organizations”:

“Citizens for a Sound Economy” <"Dormant" since CSE was morphed INTO FreedomWorks in 2005>. FreedomWorks’ Chair, Dick Armey, the former GOP House Majority leader under Newt, back during the Impeachment days, made over a half million dollars for running it in 2006.

FreedomWorks Foundation, Inc.
FreedomWorks Political Action Committee
Oregon CSE Political Action Committee
Taxpayer Defense Fund
Citizens for PERS Reform
The FreedomWorks Fund
League of Freedom Voters
CSE Freedomworks, Inc.
Judicial Integrity Coalition
Citizens for a Sound Economy, Inc.
And for each of the officers, the explanation of one of the “Related” relationships is the same:

” Historical relationship/Common board members and officers.”

The reason for this is that FreedomWorks Foundation ALSO paid the officers. For instance, “Honorable Richard K. Armey” received $100,833 in compensation from FreedomWorks, Inc. BUT he also received $403,333 from FreedomWorks Foundation.

==snip==

And, the FreedomWorks, Inc. tax return shows that in 2006, they spent $5,198,677 for

“Federal and State campaigns: Advocacy, research and education on reforming Federal and state policy in areas such as taxation, social security, spending policy, litigation reform and other related issues.”

Adding “Public Affairs” and “Other Programs” you get $5,461,994 So, about 85% of FreedomWorks, Inc’s money is spent on advertising. The other two significant expenses are salaries and fundraising. The reason that FreedomWorks is an “Inc” is that it’s a 501(c)4, which means that it can spend money on political campaigns, but they don’t have to reveal where they GOT the $6,507,198 that they spent in 2006.

They still have to pay tax on the money, but they don’t have to reveal their donors. Got that? Now, FreedomWorks Foundation — which, according to their tax returns, comprised 79.4% of Dick Armey’s brain in 2006 — is a Foundation because it’s a 501(c)3 CHARITABLE organization, which means that contributions are tax deductible, just like if Dick Armey was the head scoutmaster for the Girl Scouts of America or the Red Cross.

Because, whatever they do politically that’s NOT ‘charitable’ can be done by the 20.6% of Dick Armey’s brain that isn’t engaged in “charitable” pursuits through the FreedomWorks Foundation.

WE pay for the “charitable” foundation, of course, because we have to make up the “tax deductions” that the charity’s donors have made. Happily they have to pay tax on their contributions to the “Inc.” but nobody needs to know who they are.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC