Things will really be bad.
After the RW activist court says corporations can buy as many politicians as they can afford, you can bet any chance a worker ever had will be gone.
This concerns the case that the SCOTUS will here starting Sept. 9th that may serve to overturn any current campaign finance laws and rulings.
from an NYTimes editorial of July 4th:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/opinion/05sun2.html<snip>
The court’s new order is also deeply troubling procedurally. The question of overruling Austin was so much not a part of the Hillary Clinton film case that the parties now have to brief it — submit fully researched arguments to the court — for the first time. This is pure judicial overreach.
The feverish pace is also disturbing. The court has ordered that the arguments take place even before the new term starts. The parties, and interested citizens who want to submit friend-of-the-court briefs, will have only a short time to parse enormously complicated issues.
The most troubling part of the court’s action is the brave new world of politics it could usher in. Auto companies that receive multibillion-dollar bailouts could spend vast sums to re-elect the same officials who hand them the money. If Exxon Mobil or Wal-Mart wants something from a member of Congress, it could threaten to spend as much as it takes to defeat him or her in the next election.
<snip>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have no doubt that whatever health care laws are passed they will be reviewed immediately by SCOTUS also