Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Photo ID Case, Security Concerns Win Out Over Religious Beliefs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 10:22 PM
Original message
In Photo ID Case, Security Concerns Win Out Over Religious Beliefs
In a case that pitted religious beliefs about photographs against the ramped up security concerns following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a federal judge has ruled that an oil refinery had no duty to accommodate a worker who refused on religious grounds to pose for a photo ID.

In her 22-page opinion in Cherry v. Sunoco Inc., U.S. District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found that a 2002 federal law specifically mandated that all workers in port facilities carry photo ID, and that Sunoco had no power to waive that requirement.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202433191229&In_Photo_ID_Case_Security_Concerns_Win_Out_Over_Religious_Beliefs


Rufe, Cynthia M. Nominated by George W. Bush on January 23, 2002.
http://www.fjc.gov/public/home.nsf/hisj


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if it was a pharmacist who didn't want to sell morning after pill because of religion.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. She might lose her job unless she owned the pharmacy.
Or he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. agreed, maybe I did not make myself clear. I thought we had already decided this issue
and it is simply being applied to a new situation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's a good call by the Bush appointed judge.
I'll admit I don't know jack about the Church of the True and Living God, but this isn't the only instance in which one's religious beliefs and the requirements of the occupation do not coordinate well.

" According to court papers, Cherry is a Black Israelite and a member of the Church of the True and Living God who believes that the Second Commandment prohibits him from posing for pictures or photographs and from carrying the same upon his person."

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. ppl have the right to not apply for the job if they dont likes its job description nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. it's a sound decision
much like those states that have refused to issue driver's licenses to women whose religion forbids them from unveiling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC