Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court nixes religious displays in postal station (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:19 PM
Original message
Court nixes religious displays in postal station (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals)
NEW YORK (Reuters) – A Connecticut church may operate a postal station without violating the constitutional separation of church and state, as long as it clearly distinguishes it from private space, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday.

A panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the church in the town of Manchester did violate the U.S. Constitution by including "religious displays" such as prayer cards, pamphlets and church-related videos inside a postal station it had set up.

But it said the church could fix the violations by removing the displays and providing markers that make clear to customers where the postal station ends and church property begins.

Bertram Cooper, a former Manchester resident, had sued the Full Gospel Interdenominational Church and the U.S. Postal Service in 2003, saying the displays made him "very uncomfortable" and constituted government-sponsored religious activity.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090820/us_nm/us_usa_religion_postoffice_3


Ruling by the panel:

"We conclude that Cooper had standing to raise the Establishment Clause challenge and that an Establishment Clause violation occurred, but as to relief, we require no more than that the postal counter be free of religious material, and that visual cues distinguish the space operating as a postal facility from the space functioning as purely private property."


Judges on the panel:

Wesley, Richard C. Nominated by George W. Bush on March 5, 2003.
Jacobs, Dennis G. Nominated by George H.W. Bush on March 20, 1992.
Crotty, Paul Austin. Nominated by George W. Bush on February 14, 2005.

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/59800934-84de-4672-8439-e840c6e02df8/2/doc/07-4826-cv_opn.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's an intriguing thought:
Every year, the USPS issues Christmas stamps, always featuring a representation of a classic artwork (usually of European origin, wtf?) that depicts the Madonna and Child. If this post office in a church displayed a poster issued by the USPS promoting the annual Xmas stamp, would it have run afoul of this decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because Christmas includes aspects of multiple religions and has cultural significance as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe, if they displayed ONLY the Christmas stamp. The USPS also does other year-end holiday stamps
Edited on Thu Aug-20-09 07:49 PM by TygrBright
...every year. You have your choice of a "religious" Christmas stamp (yeah, usually madonna-type, sometimes angel-type, often based on Renaissance art; ) a "secular" Christmas stamp (snowman, poinsettia, rudolph, etc.) a Chanukah stamp (last year a nice menorah, IIRC,) a Kwanzaa stamp (not new every year but usually available; ) and sometimes a Ramadan stamp if that's falling at the end of the year.

Some years they have also done New Years' stamps with noisemakers-and-confetti or similar themes.

They try to please everyone, it sells more stamps.

If the station chose to emphasize ONLY the religious stamp, it might indeed be running afoul of the decision.

thoughtfully,
Bright

(edited to remove the smilies I forgot to turn off...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC