Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Misguided Sticky-note sentiments:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:35 PM
Original message
Misguided Sticky-note sentiments:
Edited on Thu Aug-20-09 07:43 PM by Political Heretic

"Their aim to divide... in order to conquer... haven't you realized yet?"


If I am reading this right, I assume the "their" refers to Republicans and "conquer" refers to getting elected or winning a majority.

This is a somewhat understandable statement that is slightly misguided. There are two factions in Washington, and they are not Democrats and Republicans. They are: those whose actions are driven by the interests of the wealthy elite - moneyed interests who actively desire an American serfdom ruled by a tiny special class of powerful and privileged - and those whose actions serve the majority American public that does not exist in that tiny privileged minority.

That's it. Those are the two factions. One faction represents the overwhelming majority of political representatives in Washington regardless of their technical party affiliation. The other faction represents a tiny minority truly courageous pro-people representatives who are almost totally powerless and marginalized within the Washington corporocratic system.

The combined will of pro-ruling oligarchy politicians - (R) or (D) - is that the interests of wall street be permantely favored over the interests of main street. And that's what we should be talking about.

Instead, people talking about that, have to listen to lectures about how "we're divisive" and that plays right into their hands. People cannot afford to continue being that naive.



"If you offer nothing but criticism... you become the problem. Blame you..."


You can file this one under, "meaningless quips telling people with unpopular opinions to shut up without offering a rational response." I won't even get into the fact that there's next to no one offering "nothing but criticism" - its just that the alternatives they suggest are not well received by apologists for the ruling class interests or the political status quo.

Instead, I'll just point out that this statement makes no logical sense. Getting from offering "nothing but" criticism to causing or being responsible for a problem simply does not follow. A person might very actually point out everything wrong with a particular course of action and still have no idea what alternative action to take. All that's really being said with quips like this is simply, "I'm tired of downers, so shut up."


"You were warned! Quit blaming Pres. Obama. Change is up to you!"


I partially agree with the sentiment, in that the problems that are rearing their ugly head through the course of this health care "debate" - exposing to real truths of washington politics and how completely detached it is from the interests or needs of the American people - those problems are much bigger than just Obama. So attacking one man on a more personal level while ignoring the full picture is no better than blindly cheering while a pro-corporate, anti-worker agenda slinks its way through Washington.

Change is up to us? Your right about that. What's step one? Getting ones head screwed on straight about what actually goes on in our political system, and getting it through ones head that it isn't about republicans vs. democratic divides alone. That's the superficial layer. On the superficial layer, you bet we might as well have democrats instead of republicans in seats of power if those are the only choices. There are strategic reason to vote to make that happen. But if we're going to get serious about real change - and I mean real, long term change - we have got to start seeing the deeper levels of national politics.

At a deeper level is the deep, extreme power and influence of money and privilege - this influence washes over most of our politicians. It washes over most Democrats (we've been reminded of this reality again with current events) and it washes over most Republicans. There are few exceptions, but there are exceptions. Until we find the guts to accept that moneyed and privileged interests of a super rich elite dominate and control most washington politicians and politics - even if we still make strategic choices to vote for democrats as better than a republican counterpart - then we can go exactly nowhere.

Acknowledging this basic truth about how warped our national poltics really are is essential to change. It's essential to alternative good ideas, its essential to moving a dialogue forward about how to break that strangelhold that is stifling actual small d democracy - how we can stop being unwitting pawns of corporate kings, how we can build a movement.

We must
accept
that a small
rich
minority
of
corporate
financial
and military industrial
interests
absolutely dominates
national politics
and that the majority
of all Washington politicians
across parties
across houses
or even in the white house
work for THEM
before they work for US.

Until we accept that, we will continue to remain screwed.


(Edited for formatting and to remove some sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why are you trying to divide us?
just kidding.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. People that get upset by stickie sentiments...
need to keep in mind that each stickie represents a donation to DU.

So quityerbitchin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wouldn't call it getting upset. I'd see it as an opportunity to raise some important ideas.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Brilliant post. Added to your journal, I hope. n/t
:toast:

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I often forget to do that, because I post more on my practical vision blog.
But I just went back and clicked add for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. So many can't see beyond the superficial ..
There are many here that defend Blue Dogs and Conservadems because they still view the Dem party as a whole is a big tip off.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Also, the binary political narrative is burned into our brains
...partly since corporate media reinforces the superficial level of politics as the totality of politics in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Here:
David Sirota from 2005

Partisan War Syndrome: The Left Falls Victim to a Debilitating Affliction
~Snip~

The main symptoms of Partisan War Syndrome are hallucination, delirium and obsessive compulsive behavior, with those afflicted losing almost all perspective about what winning politics really is all about. Washington, D.C., of course, could be declared a Hot Zone outbreak area, with this disease afflicting virtually every self-described strategist, operative, and lawmaker that operates in the progressive name. But it is starting to seep out everywhere-even on the Internet blogs that the mainstream media reflexively defines as the "left," "liberal" or "progressive" base.

Certainly, this disease can be difficult to detect. The mainstream media regularly portrays the so-called Democratic base as a highly ideological, "liberal" or "progressive" monolith, supposedly pressing an insulated, spineless D.C. Democratic establishment to move to the "left." This portrayal creates the image that there really is a cohesive, powerful ideological force on the left, one that is committed to convictions and issues before party-much like there is on the right. This image is reinforced by the mainstream media's constant characterization of Internet blogs and the "netroots" as an extension of this monolith-as if a medium automatically equals an ideology.

As proof that such a monolith exists, the media writes stories about this or that Democratic politician-no matter how conservative he or she is - pandering to or courting the "left" by once in a while taking a mundane Democratic Party position and then blogging about it. We also see an entire counter-industry to this mythical monolith in the form of organizations like the Democratic Leadership Council, which raise corporate money, put out reports attacking the supposedly all-powerful "left," and commission polls to discredit what, in reality, is a straw man.

~Snip~

This is why resisting Partisan War Syndrome and doing the hard work of rebuilding an ideological movement is both a moral imperative and a political necessity for the left. A grassroots base that is organized around hollow partisan labels rather than an overarching belief system - no matter how seemingly energized - will never defeat an opponent that puts ideological warriors ready to walk through fire on the political battlefield. If we do not rekindle that same fervor about actual issues on the left, we will continue living in a one-party country, losing elections into the distant future, and most disturbing of all, watching as our government serves only to protect those in power.


Looks like things haven't changed much ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-20-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. "If you offer nothing but criticism... you become the problem. Blame you..."
Very misguided sentiment there. If you like progress, thank a critic. Thank a complainer. Thank a "negative thinker." Before problems can be solved, people have to acknowledge their existence. That's the way it works.

If anyone should be blamed, it is ostriches who prefer to bury their heads in the sand or put on rose-colored glasses. They are the enablers who allow all sorts of problems to persist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's exactly right, and that truth has been repeated over and over again in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lighten up.
They are just sticky notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Um, no.
They are not just "sticky notes" - they are the wrongheaded, confused sentiment that keeps us stuck in neutral.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. To me it's a lighthearted
fund raising activity. No need to criticize IMO. There are plenty of threads to critique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It is lighthearted, and the fundraising activity is not the thing being discussed.
Sentiments are being discussed. They happened to appear as a sticky note. They could have appeared in some other form, and they often do.

The discussion is about the words being said, not the form in which they appeared.

No, even more than that, its about the need for a growing awareness of the obstacles we face. Nothing wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC