Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Betty’s Revenge: Conservatives thought they’d sidelined the 9th Circuit’s lion of liberalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:41 AM
Original message
Judge Betty’s Revenge: Conservatives thought they’d sidelined the 9th Circuit’s lion of liberalism

Betty Fletcher, 86, is a liberal icon and the most powerful woman in Seattle you've never heard of. Sadly for conservatives, she just won't stop working.

Conservatives thought they’d sidelined the 9th Circuit’s lion of liberalism. They were wrong.
By Nina Shapiro


Ten years ago, federal judge Betty Fletcher said she would step aside. It was late in the Clinton administration, and Congressional Republicans, who'd long had it in for the left-leaning 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where Fletcher presides, were refusing to confirm the President's nomination of Fletcher's son William to the same Circuit as his mother. They called it "nepotism."

As a concession, Fletcher, then 76, agreed to take a form of quasi-retirement known as "senior status." There are loose rules governing "senior" judges, who only have to work one-quarter time to receive full pay. Accordingly, most cut back dramatically and spend the extra time at country clubs or with their grandchildren.

"Let's just say Betty Fletcher is having the last laugh," says Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, a liberal Washington, D.C.–based group that monitors judicial nominations. Fletcher's son was confirmed, but she never did reduce her caseload. Today, the white-haired, Seattle-based jurist—who over the course of her career was the first woman in the city to hold virtually every title she assumed—still hears some 620 cases a year, even as she uses a walker to get around her chambers. And she continues to be a thorn in the side of conservative interests. Last year, for example, she bucked President George W. Bush and the U.S. Navy by authoring the opinion of a three-judge panel upholding restrictions on sonar exercises said to harm marine life. The year before that, she tossed out the Bush administration's proposed fuel-efficiency standards for SUVs and "light trucks" as too weak, writing that environmental laws required the administration to take into account greenhouse-gas emissions.

Though practically unknown in her hometown outside legal circles, Fletcher is a high-powered icon of liberalism, the likes of whom may never again get the nod for a federal bench. She's a holdout from an unprecedented era of left-wing judicial appointments under President Jimmy Carter, after which moderates became the name of the game, at least for Democrats. For all the controversy over Sonia Sotomayor, with whom Fletcher shares some traits, the recently confirmed Supreme Court Justice is strictly middle-of-the-road compared to Fletcher.

http://www.seattleweekly.com/2009-08-19/news/judge-betty-s-revenge/


Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nominated by Jimmy Carter on July 12, 1979, to a new seat created by 92 Stat. 1629; Confirmed by the Senate on September 26, 1979, and received commission on September 26, 1979. Assumed senior status on November 1, 1998.

http://www.fjc.gov/public/home.nsf/hisj




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for putting a face on the Ninth Circuit. I've admired their rulings for many years
but never knew much about who the judges were.

Jimmy Carter sure did a lot for our country, our democracy and our Constitution, during the short term that our corpo/fascist rulers permitted him to be president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They cut off Jimmy Carter from Congress by muddying up the process on Capitol Hill.
A lot of money flowed between Wall Street and Capitol Hill to ensure a lot of politicians would not try to work with Jimmy Carter. Had there been less interference from corporate lobbyists, there probably would've been better relations between the White House and Congress during the Carter years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. How funny!!!
I've lived in Seattle for years and I don't remember ever hearing the name Betty Fletcher before!

You go, girl!

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Thanks for posting this, usregimechange! K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Recommended.
Go, Judge Fletcher!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Those damn activist judges never die!!!! Bwahahahahahahaha!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC