Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gang Of Six Looking For Scissors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 07:56 AM
Original message
Gang Of Six Looking For Scissors
I say fire the lot of them. They are all useless. :grr:

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019581.php


GANG OF SIX LOOKING FOR SCISSORS.... For most of the early summer, the political world waited on six members of the Senate Finance Committee -- centrists and center-right members from rural states -- to approve a bill. They couldn't. Members wanted more time, and got more time. It didn't matter. Hopes that the Senate might pass a measure before the August recess were dashed because the so-called Gang of Six wanted to negotiate some more.

Three weeks into August, have they made progress? No, members of the gang haven't gotten together for a chat. They'd talked about the possibility of a meeting, but Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) scrapped the plans, citing a busy summer schedule.

Late yesterday, the Gang of Six managed to connect over the phone. They reportedly raised the idea of moving the reform legislation even further to the right.

In a conference call, the three Democratic and three Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee agreed to redouble their efforts to craft a less costly alternative to the trillion-dollar initiatives so far put forward in Congress. They discussed the possibility of also reining in the scope of their package, the sources said. <...>

Before leaving for the month-long recess, Baucus had pegged the cost of the negotiators' ideas at less than $900 billion over the next decade. Thursday's discussions focused on driving that cost lower, the sources said.


At the risk of beating a dead horse, note that the only reason to "rein in the scope" of reform, and try to make the efforts much cheaper, would be to satisfy the demands of conservative Republicans -- the conservative Republicans who oppose health care reform, and who intend to vote against the bill anyway.

This is madness.


Also note, before the recess, the Gang of Six was given a Sept. 15 deadline. At that point, Senate leaders have said, the legislative process will just have continue on without them. According to the WaPo account, the six "rejected the idea of imposing a deadline on their negotiations," and said they'd chat again in two weeks.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. S T A L L I N G
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Reminds me of an old news story about the Iraqi Parliament -- they were
meeting every month or so to agree that they couldn't possibly agree on anything, except meeting again in another month or so. (Then they wanted to take the summer off, and the BigOil people who were waiting for contracts had a collective fit).

The Rethugs think the status quo is actually perfectly fine, and any sort of change is being strenuously avoided while attempting to keep up the facade of "cooperation." The Rethugs should be left in the dust.

Grassley flat-out LIED when he said President Obama was willing to give up on the public option. I wish we could just impeach Grassley. The man is either senile or deliberately lying, and is not competent to serve on a town council, much less be involved in policy-making at a national level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. If it has to be "bi-partisan' then there should be 4 Democrats and 2 Republicans in the room
Why is it that the assembly of white men who are deciding the future of health care financing in this country is not proportionately similar to the makeup of the Senate instead of the 50/50 mix that Max Bacus has shat down upon us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. why is the leadership giving them until sept 15?
it looks like actually having to do their jobs -- has made them all lose their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think they're on 'recess' until the first or second week of Sept.
That probably has something to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC