Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freepers in trouble - Right Wing Media wants their money (DER SPIEGEL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:25 PM
Original message
Freepers in trouble - Right Wing Media wants their money (DER SPIEGEL)
Paid Content

The Days of the Internet Free Lunch Are Numbered

By Isabel Hülsen (DER SPIEGEL)


Media mogul Rupert Murdoch: "Quality journalism isn't cheap." (OP's add here: :rofl: )

Media billionaire Rupert Murdoch wants to start charging online readers of his newspapers a fee. His decision has launched a fierce debate over the future of the culture of free content on the Internet. It has also posed a difficult question for publishers: How much are we worth to readers?

Rupert Murdoch has no use for computers. The 78-year-old Australian-American media billionaire doesn't like e-mail, he avoids the Internet and he even has trouble using his mobile phone. He doesn't exactly fit the picture of an online messiah.

But in recent weeks, Murdoch startled the publishing world when he uttered a few sentences that were as simple as they were revolutionary, such as: "Quality journalism isn't cheap." That led to his decision to start charging for online use of his many newspapers around the globe in the coming months. If Murdoch has his way, the days of free culture on the Internet will be numbered.

It didn't take much time after the remarks by Murdoch, CEO of News Corporation and owner of hundreds of newspapers and television stations, for the response to start pouring in: publishers the world over agreed. If anyone needed proof that Murdoch is still the mogul of media moguls, this was it.


Read full article here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Soak em good Rupe.



Good luck in getting money out of rethuglicants.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. If newspapers think we're goin to pay for their garbage, they have another thought coming
If they need more money, they best increase their advertising and continue to allow free access to the information or they will risk losing their readership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's entirely possible for papers to block out their areas
to online readers. Anyone signing on with a local IP address could be refused access to the content.

It's not an easy process but it can be done. Local advertising is already being targeted through Google ads. It doesn't take a terribly large leap of imagination to consider using the process to block content the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Bring it on. Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 12:33 PM by SpiralHawk
"I got boodles O' bucks in my Swiss Bank accounts, so who gives a flying felafel (other than Bill O'Reilly) about some chump change here and there. Smirk."

- xCommander AWOL (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hopefully his account is on the UBS list. ;)
So he'll end up without reading the Financial Times. But I think he's as IT savvy as Murdoch himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Quality journalism? What does Murdoch know about that?
C'est pour rire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's why I added the :rofl: smilie.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Quality Journalism"...
The only properties Fox owns that offer anything worthwhile in regards to political and social commentary are there Sunday evening animated programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC