Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Betsy McCaughey said she wants a full subsidy for households making under $50K a year ?!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:36 PM
Original message
Betsy McCaughey said she wants a full subsidy for households making under $50K a year ?!?!?
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 06:36 PM by Motown_Johnny
On Jon's Stewart's show last night.. well, in the full version posted on The Daily Show Site


http://www.thedailyshow.com/



The second part of the interview, at about 4:30 in she tries to explain her "plan" to Jon after he does the math on her 'plan" and does not get an answer where people get the other three thousand dollars. Before she starts with the letter from the doctor, etc.


She says "a full subsidy for any household making less than fifty thousand dollars a year". She then suggests that it is more generous than the house bill and I tend to agree. Jon interrupts here by asking if her only problem with the bill is that it will kill old people. I guess he was worried that nobody had laughed at her in almost 30 seconds, hut that is the point at which the topic changes.


I am kinda surprised that this got passed over so quickly.


A full subsidy for all households making less than 50 thousand dollars a year is a compromise I might be able to get behind. Assuming there are partial subsidies for households making more than the 50 K a year, until it phases out at a higher income level. Maybe 95K a year or so.


There would need to be cost controls in place so this does not just funnel tax money to insurance companies but I see some glimmer of hope in this concept. I would like to see this combined with the "market place for health care" that President Obama has suggested. That way you would go and spend your subsidy in the market place that is government regulated.


Yes, she is bat shit crazy, but even that nut job can see that people need help with affordable health care and out of all that insane ranting in the interview she did have one brief moment that made sense. Maybe that is why she had to resign today.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly
She'd like to make the government buy expensive and largely useless insurance for those folks. More money for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that is the one pitfall that would need to be avoided. We would need to limit costs to keep the
spending under control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Absolutely
It could also lend credence to the RW talking point that we can't afford reform. Imagine if the government had to buy private insurance for millions of people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. If we had a public option and payroll deductions why would there be a need for subsidy?
Extend medicare to all. We all pay into it and those who want private insurance can have it those who don't have the public option. It would be available to those with a private plan paid for by their employer who lose their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. This Cannot Be Allowed, Sir, Simply To Be a Transfer Of Tax Monies To Insurance Company Coffers
Certainly a weasel like that would favor such a course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC