Friday, August 21, 2009
Robert Reich's Blog
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-gang-of-six-is-deciding-health-care.htmlLast night, the so-called "gang of six" -- three Republican and three Democratic senators on the Senate Finance Committee -- met by conference call and, according to Senator Max Baucus, the committee's chair, reaffirmed their commitment "toward a bipartisan health-care reform bill" (read: less coverage and no public insurance option). The Washington Post reports that the senators shared tales from their home states, where some have been besieged by protesters angry about a potential government takeover of the nation's health care system.
It's come down to these six senators. The House has reported a bill as has another Senate committee, but all eyes are fixed on Senate Finance -- and on these three Dems and three Republicans, in particular. But who, exactly, anointed these six to decide the fate of the nation's health care?
skip
It's not even as if the gang represents America. The three Dems on the gang are from Montana, New Mexico, and North Dakota -- states that together account for just over 1 percent of Americans. The three Republicans are from Maine, Wyoming, and Iowa, which together account for 1.6 percent of the American population.
So, I repeat: Why has it come down to these six? Who anointed them? Apparently, the White House. At least that's what I'm repeatedly being told by sources both on the Hill and in the Administration. "The Finance Committee is where the action is. They'll tee-up the final bill," says someone who should know.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019581.phpThe Political Animal
Steve Benen August 21,2009
GANG OF SIX LOOKING FOR SCISSORS
For most of the early summer, the political world waited on six members of the Senate Finance Committee -- centrists and center-right members from rural states -- to approve a bill. They couldn't. Members wanted more time, and got more time. It didn't matter. Hopes that the Senate might pass a measure before the August recess were dashed because the so-called Gang of Six wanted to negotiate some more.
skip
Late yesterday, the Gang of Six managed to connect over the phone. They reportedly raised the idea of moving the reform legislation even further to the right.
skip
At the risk of beating a dead horse, note that the only reason to "rein in the scope" of reform, and try to make the efforts much cheaper, would be to satisfy the demands of conservative Republicans -- the conservative Republicans who oppose health care reform, and who intend to vote against the bill anyway.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
I'd like to use Robert Reich's comment "The Finance Committee is where the action is " to segue into this OP of mine in GDP specifically about that very issue.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8605684*************************************************************************************************************************************
Here are the major take aways:
The Senate Finance Committee is where the action is
Max Baucus has been the go-to person for negotiating with both the drug and the hospital industries
at the behest of the White House The Senate Finance Committee has been effectively reduced to six members - 3 Dems and 3 Repubs described above as "centrists and center right members from rural states"
apparently at the behest of the White HouseEvery single item I have posted is recent and from a credible source - The New York Times, The Washington Monthly, and Robert Reich.
Taken in totality - they paint an extremely bleak picture of what the White House has actually been working toward in terms of real healthcare reform.
If we get a public option, if we get drug negotiation, if we get anything approaching universal coverage, if we get ANYTHING that is more than RomneyCare, it will be due to the efforts of the Progressive caucus in the House.