Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you support healthcare "reform" WITHOUT a strong public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you support healthcare "reform" WITHOUT a strong public option
Do you support healthcare "reform" without a strong public option
This public option would be similar to the current medicare system you have for senior citizens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not only do I absolutely NOT support any bullshit "reform" without a REAL public option.
I also will not support any corporatist prostitution excuse for a political party that cannot pass such a bill despite having the White House and significant majorities in both houses of Congress.

This is my line in the sand. I am DONE with the Democratic party if they fuck up this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Somebody is going to have to introduce a real public option here soon, because so far there isn't
one in front of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Good point - I don't think there is a single bill out there that contains a real, robust public
option.
If there IS one, someone please show us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. They should stick one into Wyden's bill, as an amendment.
Edited on Sat Aug-22-09 10:40 PM by John Q. Citizen
Somebody is going to have to do it though, because they aren't going to be able to magically plop one in during conference. I doubt anything coming out of conference will be any better than anything going in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. HR676
what's more of a "public option" than single payer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Yep - agree that HR676 is the only one that's REAL reform - too bad it's getting so little attention
All of the other bills are non-reform "reform".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. This governing stuff is HARD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
50. Single Payer all the way--to DC: Join the Mad as Hell Doctors!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6369387

https://madashelldoctorstour.com/Home_Page.html



The Plan:



Mad Doctors Hit the Road

On September 8, 2009 a group of dedicated Oregon physicians will take the message of Universal Health Care "on the road" in a wrapped and branded Motor Home headed for Washington D.C. Our cross-country mission: to stop in big cities and whistle stops alike, conducting pre-booked, local and national media appearances for a curious press. Every move we make along the way will be recorded on camera and then edited and uploaded to the internet that same day. This will allow our Mad As Hell Doctors Tour to leverage the edited video segments on social networking web sites such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, MySpace, et al. In this way, our effort becomes an unprecedented hybrid of reality television and political activism that offers people the opportunity to follow us, in real time, as our story unfolds. The message will be unmistakable: caravan with us to Washington and help make a public demonstration of support for Single Payer Health Care that will be heard around the world.

Imagine...

Thousands of cars pulling into the nation's capital for a protest on the White House lawn. The sidewalks are filled with supporters carrying signs in support of the Mad As Hell Doctors who have captured the imagination and the ignited the passion of their fellow citizens. We wave and honk at the camera crews, as do the endless line of cars behind us, as we wend our way toward the White House. On every antenna, on the backside of every car, and flapping like flags from sidewalk supporters, is the symbol of this new movement: the White Ribbon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. +2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. ++++++++++ Me too!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. +∞
Edited on Sat Aug-22-09 10:30 PM by cascadiance
+ ∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. I'm STANDING with you.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
48. Tending to agree with that. Dammitol--if the Republicons can ram through the heinous shit they did
under Bush, why the hell can't we get Dems who will stand up for our Democracy?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Giving subsidies to private insurance companies in this year's bill...
...will make the insurance companies more powerful in the future, in itself.

Without a public option in this year's bill to reduce their power, it will be MORE difficult to get a public option in a future bill.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Exactly - any bullshit non-reform "reform" will set back any possibility of real reform by DECADES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fuck NO..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. No.
Because there is no such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I really do not understand why some type of Medicare can not
be set up for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. There really isn't a reason beyond the insurance companies hating the idea.
Edited on Sat Aug-22-09 09:42 PM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. And some Democrats, including the administration, agreeing with them.
My idea for health insurance reform is exactly what Lawrence O'Donnell has said: Introduce legislation that removes the qualifications on Medicare (age 65 or on disability).

Removing that from the Medicare program would open it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not reform it there's no public option
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hate to burst people's bubbles when I ask this question, but do we even have a choice here?
This is a republic where once you elect an asshole to make decisions for you, he is free to jam it up your ass for the next two years if he is a congressman, four years if he is your president, and six fucking years if he is your senator.

There is no such thing as a recall referendum here.

Then, when the asswipe's term expires. You can elect him again for another ass raping session.

Oh, did I forget to mention that he gets paid your tax dollars?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heppcatt Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Mandating people to buy insurance with no public option is a
insurance company give away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. The public option - at least how it's written in HR3200
won't kick in for years and the bill mandates we buy insurance. Most of us will be stuck buying from the insurance companies.

Even with a public option, HR3200 should be named "The Health Insurance Company Protection Act".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. OMFG! It's evolved into a FLYING PIG FLU!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. I really, really, really favor a plan with a strong public option (actually I'd really
Edited on Sat Aug-22-09 09:49 PM by iris27
prefer single-payer or NHS-style universal health care). If we don't get one, I will be confused and disappointed as fuck with the Blue Dog assholes.

BUT I would rather see a bill pass, even one without a public option, that eliminated pre-existing conditions, lifetime limits, and imposed yearly out-of-pocket maximums for the consumer, than continue with the completely untenable status fucking quo.

ETA: I'm still pissed at the whole idea of making it mandatory to buy coverage. Obama gave Clinton all kinds of crap during the primaries for her mandatory coverage plan...to me that makes it dishonest of him to push for any plan that requires the purchase of health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. California enacted tough laws in the early 90's regarding pre-existing conditions.
The Insurance Cartel were still able to get around those laws, because there was a wait time. People who are ill don't have the luxury of waiting six months for treatment. Without a strong public option they will find ways around laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. And NO deductibles
Deductibles are a form of rationing by cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. If we get Romney care, (no public pool) then we won't see any movement for years and cost
will kill us.

There is no reason that private insurance should be subsidized with tax dollars. There is no reason that congress can't outlaw pre-existing conditions, mandate community rating, require guaranteed issue, and impose out of pocket caps.

The problem is our president and our congress are bargaining with an on-going criminal enterprise when they should be disbanding them.

I disagree with folding to end the status quo. The insurance industry want to end the status quo. Lets not fold cheap.

We are more powerful than we think. As America ages the insurance company leeches have fewer people to sell their useless product to.

As prices go up fewer people buy insurance.

They are very quick to come to the table to make sure that we give them a trillion in new tax dollars every decade and that they get all that private money from mandates.

I say we hold out for single payer, or at the very least, a mega public option that utilized Medicare reimbusments, that negotiates for drug prices, that starts out covering 130 million people, that lets everybody and anybody in the pool who wants in.

Why are we selling out for a bunch of fucking bullshit? A mega public option, fully functional and ready to rumble is already the sell out position.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not 'Important'...
...Absolutely Essential!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Can't call Las Vegas a beach; it has no ocean.
Can't call it "reform" without a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Public Option
is a sell out compromise doomed to fail IMHO. I don't support anything less than single payer and the fucking politicians don't even consider single payer an option. Turn about is fair play I suppose. I no longer consider some of those fucking politicians to be viable options to getr my vote to retain their position.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. I could if there were adequate regulation of private insurance
As it is, ww have inadequate regulation of private insurance combined with an inadequate public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. One day, we'll wake up and nationalize health care. Til then a strong PO is a must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. I'm thinking that one day we will wake up and pass the employee free choice act
I'm thinking until then, some people really like the non-union status they already enjoy.

So we need choices. (kind of like in health care, right)

Yeah we should make it that there is a labor pool that some people can get into if they want to but only if their isn';t another pool they can affiliate with, but other people shouldn't have to affiliate at all if they so choose. Now that will cost the union extra money, to just represent part of the workers at any business, but the other pool can represent those other workers.

See, we need a free market solution to unionization, until that day we wake up and do it right!

OK

I'm attempting satire here and it probably isn't funny.

But neither is this free market alternative to a socialized risk pool for health care crap. Please tell your union rep, single payer. The rest is republican bullshit. You know it and i know it.

Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Whether I'll vote for Dems in '10 and '12 hinges on a few things..
1. Health Care reform. Meaning Single Payer or at least a strong public option.

2. Enactment of The Employee Free Choice Act.

3. Lobbyist and Campaign Finance Reform.

4. End of all wars. Or at the least a significant withdrawal by '10 and total withdrawal by '12.

I'm a UAW member. I was expecting EFCA to be signed into law by April 1st. Then I woke up and realized that Dems are in charge and they're about as capable of passing cornerstone level legislation as Rush is at saying nice things about our president.

The list of Dems that are opposed to EFCA grows. And it's a disgustingly growing list. How these people can actually call themselves Dems is beyond logic.

Which is why I might be voting straight Socialist Party in '10.

If they can't pass EFCA then fuck the Dems.


BTW I got your satire, and you're better at it than you give yourself credit for.

:hi:

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. When the language changed from health CARE reform to heath INSURANCE reform, I stood on a chair ....
...... bent waaaaaay over ...... and kissed my ass goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. That's right. You can't really call it health CARE reform if no PO.
But then, most folks have resorted to calling it health INSURANCE reform anyway. Without a PO, it's just a mandate that we subsidize the insurance industry CEO gigantic compensation, and industry profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. Maybe they're dragging their feet to put off the inevitable new party being started...
Perhaps they feel if they push it out another few months to a year, that there won't be time for those that are *FED UP* to start a new party to try and do away with the corporatists come 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. We need a new party so, so, soooooo badly.
I'm utterly fed up with the corporatists.

Both of my grandfathers were union organizers back in the 30s and 40s, so perhaps it's in my blood to want a party that stands up FOR THE PEOPLE - average working people, and the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. If they put out a crappy bill, perhaps the day it gets signed we prepare big announcements!
Edited on Sun Aug-23-09 12:51 AM by cascadiance
Where either we do massive primary challenges in 2010, or that we're starting a new party right there and then. Maybe both!

If we try and get that word out the very same day that bill gets signed, and find some way that the M$M can't avoid talking about it, that would make that whole "just claiming a victory" goal to seem hollow, so they will have done that whole mess for nothing, other than to show their protecting their corporatist cabal, and giving us a whole raison d'etre for putting in place a new party.

Maybe talk a whole bunch of Democratic House members as well as a few in the Senate like Bernie Sanders, Howard Dean, etc. to switch to joining this new party then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. "Public option" is quickly becoming the new meaningless phrase
The old meaningless phrase was "universal health care." What does "public option" actually mean these days? Heck if I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Universal health care was first used by Jessie Jackson in his 1988 presidential race He meant single
payer.

Then Hillery co-opted the term and tried to pass the soup du jour alternative market driven fad plan, "Managed care."

Public option is the new alternative market driven fad plan.

But what we all really want is single payer because we all know it works and provides everyone with access, and it's pretty easy and simple.

But they won't let us off the hook so easy. They want their cash and they want some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Another meaningless term that gets used a lot is "affordable health care"
no one who uses that term explains what "affordable" means - or mentions anything about the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our third quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Are you in favor of single payer bot maintenance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bring on "Medicare for All. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
49. I only support single payer health care ...it's a human right! Screw the insurance sociopths...
and those asscarrots sucking off the insurance money tit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
52. A public option is just as crucial as is the requirement that everyone buy health insurance. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC