|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:20 AM Original message |
MSNBC TV: Interim appointment or full appointment to replace Ted Kennedy off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. sucks, but its the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
2. When did Nancy Pelosi become the governor of Massachusetts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlyDemocrat (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
3. Law of unintended consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. WTF does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlyDemocrat (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Mass changed the law to prevent Romney from appointing Kerry's successor in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueStater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
4. Who could secede him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. secede? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. They obviously meant 'succeed'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Frank and Capuano get mentioned a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I'd love to see Barney Frank in the Senate. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:29 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Barney said on NPR this morning that he's not going to run for Ted's Senate seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:33 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
7. Scary thought, but in a special election is there any chance we would have Sen. Mitt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tracer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 08:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. No chance at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Eyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
9. Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. That's because the law for succession is the way it is--but if the MA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
15. Blue Dog "Dems" don't have an LBJ strong arm to reign them in either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
18. Who said this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-26-09 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
19. Great, now we have one less vote for the public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC