Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Technological way to reduce traffic accidents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 07:59 AM
Original message
A Technological way to reduce traffic accidents
Texting and voice use of cell phones increases the incidence of traffic accidents.

Cell phones, by regulation, have GPS receivers built into them these days. By comparing its location from one moment to the next a GPS can determine its own speed, its a basic function built into almost all of them.

Why not amend the existing regulation to require that all cell phones automatically disable themselves when moving at speeds between (just for discussion) 25 and 75 mph. Basically, if you are in a moving car the cell phone will not work.

For those who would argue that they are traveling salesmen and need their phone while on the road I might make an exception for units built into the hard wiring and speaker system of the vehicle - although I personally think its a bad idea.

What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. This would also disable passengers' phones and the phones of people traveling in trains. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It would also disable emergency use by a driver in a moving vehicle
Edited on Wed Aug-26-09 08:20 AM by TommyO
Hell, it would disable emergency use by anybody in a moving vehicle.

The OP's solution introduces more problems than it solves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You could provide an exception for 911 service.
Most phones allow you to dial 911 even if you plan is suspended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Not all emergencies are 911 related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. For any emergency not 911 related you could stop the car to make the call.
The phones could even be designed to notify you when someone is calling you but not let the call through.

Not saying we should do it but there is not technical reason to do so and people certainly don't have a "right" to make phone and receive phone calls while driving.

At a minimum I see no problem w/ using GPD to block highspeed texting. That is utter insanity. With hands free phone setup you can at least be moderately safe and keep eyes on the road and hands of the wheel (although the mental distraction is a problem).

People texting with one hand while looking down at the tiny screen in traffic is just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. I still think this is a problem best solved with education.
Edited on Wed Aug-26-09 09:01 AM by MindPilot
Every day I see commercials telling me not to drink and drive because I will get arrested; that if I get caught without a seat belt, I'll get a ticket. Nothing about texting or cell phone use.

Funny thing though, it's all about fearing the "man", not the real reason to buckle up, stay sober and focus on driving which at least in my mind is not suffering an agonizing death in a fiery crash; or even worse spending the rest of my life living with the guilt of knowing my stupid lapse of judgment maimed someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think I would be doing 80 when I need to make a call
bad idea. sorry, I use my cell phone while driving because both are part of my job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. When this baby hits 88 mph...
How about a little extra training and an endorsement on one's license for cell-phone use? Cops, firefighters all kinds of professionals have been driving and talking on their radios for decades. Doing other stuff while driving is a skill that can be taught
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer on a stick Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. As someone who's had that training.....
I assure you, driving at code 3 at over 80mph and utilizing the radio is not something that's trained for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. At 80 it would automatically report your for speeding anywhere but Montana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-26-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. ah-hem You are way outta date. We lost that free range high speed thing years ago
Interestingly, accidents went up when the speed limits came on. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC