Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A case of the NIMBYs slows down California's high-speed rail plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:08 AM
Original message
A case of the NIMBYs slows down California's high-speed rail plans
via MassTransitMag:



Judge Issues Ruling in California High-Speed Rail Lawsuit

By Jessica Bernstein-Wax
San Jose Mercury News (California)


CALIFORNIA - A judge's ruling Wednesday put the brakes on California's plan to shoot high-speed trains up the Peninsula, giving project opponents a glimmer of hope that the eventual route may go through the East Bay.

But a top official of the California High-Speed Rail Authority was quick to point out the decision won't bring his agency's plans to a screeching halt. He acknowledged, however, that it could delay construction and cause the project to lose as much as $3 billion in state and federal funding.

"We can't afford to throw away $3 billion because of what I consider to be, and many people consider to be, a frivolous lawsuit," said rail authority board member Rod Diridon, referring to the lawsuit filed by Menlo Park, Atherton and environmental groups that challenges the board's decision to run bullet trains through Pacheco Pass and the Peninsula instead of Altamont Pass and the East Bay.

Opponents of the project declared the ruling a victory, however, and sent out a flurry of jubilant e-mails Wednesday afternoon.

"We didn't win every point, but we won enough points that I would say it's pretty convincing," said Stuart Flashman, attorney for the cities and environmental groups. "It's enough that it forces them to re-evaluate everything. They'll have to go back and look again at Altamont versus Pacheco." ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.masstransitmag.com/web/online/Top-Transit-News/Judge-Issues-Ruling-in-California-High-Speed-Rail-Lawsuit/3$9447




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Translated: They don't have the money for even eminent domain takings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. I read another story this weekend about the train line being slowed
because of unsatisfactory environmental impact reports. However this article says it won't slow progress:
http://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/show_story.php?id=13616

You have to admit that Pacheco Pass goes straight through a beautiful wilderness area that will be irreparably damaged by a rail line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC