'The Agency Went over Bounds and Outside the Rules'There was a heated debate between the Justice Department and the CIA in the run-up to the report's publication.
The intelligence agency was worried that releasing it would hurt both the CIA's reputation and the morale of its employees.
The Justice Department argued that it was necessary to bring some transparency to these past events, that the public had a right to it,
and that President Obama had promised it in the wake of his predecessor's secretiveness.Interview conducted by Britta Sandberg. (DER SPIEGEL) 08/31/2009John Helgerson, 65, was responsible for drawing up the 2004 report into CIA interrogations of terror suspects which has now been released by the Obama administration. The former CIA inspector general talks to SPIEGEL about allegations of abuse and the "disorganization" of the interrogations program after 9/11.SPIEGEL: Why did you initiate a review of the CIA's interrogations program at the beginning of 2003?
John Helgerson: At the time, we thought it important to look systematically at such an important program that had been in operation since shortly after 9/11. In addition, we wanted to respond to expressions of concern by some agency employees involved with the program who were uneasy about it. Actually there were a number of individuals who expressed to me their concern about various aspects of this program. They had the feeling that what the agency was doing was fundamentally inconsistent with past US government policy and American values. It was something new and unprecedented for the agency. A critical legal opinion was missing which I believed was needed to protect agency employees and detainees. It was then my own initiative to undertake this review. And in the process we found things that we did not expect to find.Read full interview
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,646010,00.html">here.
Interesting part here:
SPIEGEL: So the CIA used torture and methods resembling torture for nothing?
Helgerson: For nothing? This is not a matter of black or white -- "yes, they worked" or "no, they did not." Valuable, actionable information was elicited, using a variety of techniques, including long accepted, traditional approaches.Unfortunately, torture is quite the black/white kind of stuff as in pain/no pain. What's the grey part? Tickling your toes? Anticipating sleeping under a waterfall?