Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-CIA Inspector General on Interrogation Report (DER SPIEGEL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 03:43 PM
Original message
Ex-CIA Inspector General on Interrogation Report (DER SPIEGEL)
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 03:44 PM by Call Me Wesley

'The Agency Went over Bounds and Outside the Rules'


There was a heated debate between the Justice Department and the CIA in the run-up to the report's publication.
The intelligence agency was worried that releasing it would hurt both the CIA's reputation and the morale of its employees.
The Justice Department argued that it was necessary to bring some transparency to these past events, that the public had a right to it,
and that President Obama had promised it in the wake of his predecessor's secretiveness.


Interview conducted by Britta Sandberg. (DER SPIEGEL) 08/31/2009

John Helgerson, 65, was responsible for drawing up the 2004 report into CIA interrogations of terror suspects which has now been released by the Obama administration. The former CIA inspector general talks to SPIEGEL about allegations of abuse and the "disorganization" of the interrogations program after 9/11.

SPIEGEL: Why did you initiate a review of the CIA's interrogations program at the beginning of 2003?

John Helgerson: At the time, we thought it important to look systematically at such an important program that had been in operation since shortly after 9/11. In addition, we wanted to respond to expressions of concern by some agency employees involved with the program who were uneasy about it. Actually there were a number of individuals who expressed to me their concern about various aspects of this program. They had the feeling that what the agency was doing was fundamentally inconsistent with past US government policy and American values. It was something new and unprecedented for the agency. A critical legal opinion was missing which I believed was needed to protect agency employees and detainees. It was then my own initiative to undertake this review. And in the process we found things that we did not expect to find.


Read full interview http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,646010,00.html">here.


Interesting part here:

SPIEGEL: So the CIA used torture and methods resembling torture for nothing?

Helgerson: For nothing? This is not a matter of black or white -- "yes, they worked" or "no, they did not." Valuable, actionable information was elicited, using a variety of techniques, including long accepted, traditional approaches.


Unfortunately, torture is quite the black/white kind of stuff as in pain/no pain. What's the grey part? Tickling your toes? Anticipating sleeping under a waterfall?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's been a growing acceptance of the (warped) thinking that
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 04:13 PM by Solly Mack
torture isn't torture if the torture applied didn't go beyond the level of torture sanctioned.

The below excerpt is an example of that (warped) thinking.

"Our principal findings related to the manner in which the waterboarding had been carried out, as compared with the understanding that had been reached between the CIA and the Department of Justice. Basically, there was the matter of the frequency of the applications. We also observed that the way waterboarding was conducted was not consistent with what has been described concerning the amount of water"

Waterboarding is torture. Period. One drop of water or a thousand drops of water - ALL torture. Whether a person is waterboarded 1 time or 183 times - ALL torture.

When waterboarding is carried out - even once (full stop) - it is a crime against humanity. When it is carried out during war, it is also a war crime.

I am so sick of the bullshit talking point that (somehow) torture is only illegal if you torture a person beyond the agreed upon amount of torture.

The very thinking that one can legally authorize a certain amount of torture?

Shameful. Disgusting. Disgraceful. Craven. Sick.

It's the language of torture apologists and cowards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I fully agree with you
and whatever warped rhetoric excuses they come up with, from an ethical standpoint of view, torture cannot be excused. It saddens me to see that some will get away by saying, 'I didn't cut in his throat as deep as someone else did. I was very humane; I just stabbed him a little. In the end, it was fun, ya know?!'

We also observed that the way waterboarding was conducted was not consistent with what has been described concerning the amount of water. Legally speaking, if they get away with this, empty all the prisons at once for anyone who did not commit murder in the first place. 'I just cut his arm off. I didn't burn him like described elsewhere. I was just doing surgical treatments on him to find some stuff out. Hey, it was all in fun!'

Send them to jail. Investigate, and don't retreat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm appalled that I'm expected to be outraged that Cheney
is OK with engaging in more torture than the torture agreed upon as acceptable by a war criminal executive...as if the extra torture is somehow the reason to be outraged.

OMG! Cheney doesn't respect the Constitution! Cheney supports the unacceptable torture that goes beyond the acceptable torture!

Of course Cheney doesn't respect the law and is OK with torture - he's a war criminal for fuck's sake.

The amount of torture doesn't matter..it's the torture. Period.

And American TV, parading its war criminals from (so-called) news show to news show. So shameful.


And I agree...empty the prisons. If a war criminal executive don't deserve prison...no one does.

Sorry. Ranting. :D






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please don't apologize for ranting.
The past eight years will take some time to heal, and I really hope that especially Cheney will be brought to court. Even if whole Europe will have a warrant out on his war crimes, I'd be half-satisfied, since he still can have enjoyable holidays within the US. Like Kissinger can't really visit France anymore ...

On a side-note, did you observe the latest German State elections? I think there will be some big surprises in September ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC