Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The River in Reverse: Looking Back at the Drowning of New Orleans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:55 PM
Original message
The River in Reverse: Looking Back at the Drowning of New Orleans


The destruction of New Orleans represents a confluence of many of the most pernicious trends in American politics and culture: poverty, racism, militarism, elitist greed, environmental abuse, public corruption and the decay of democracy at every level.

Much of this is embodied in the odd phrasing that even the most circumspect mainstream media sources have been using to describe the hardest-hit victims of the storm and its devastating aftermath: "those who chose to stay behind." Instantly, the situation has been framed with language to flatter the prejudices of the comfortable and deny the reality of the most vulnerable.

It is obvious that the vast majority of those who failed to evacuate are poor: they had nowhere else to go, no way to get there, no means to sustain themselves and their families on strange ground. While there were certainly people who stayed behind by choice, most stayed behind because they had no choice. They were trapped by their poverty - and many have paid the price with their lives.

Yet across the media spectrum, the faint hint of disapproval drips from the affluent observers, the clear implication that the victims were just too lazy and shiftless to get out of harm's way. There is simply no understanding - not even an attempt at understanding - the destitution, the isolation, the immobility of the poor and the sick and the broken among us....

Where were the resources - the money, manpower, materiel, transport - that could have removed all those forced to stay behind, and given them someplace safe and sustaining to take shelter? Where, indeed, were the resources that could have bolstered the city's defenses and shored up its levees? Where were the National Guard troops that could have secured the streets and directed survivors to food and aid? Where were the public resources - the physical manifestation of the citizenry's commitment to the common good - that could have greatly mitigated the brutal effects of this natural disaster?


...

http://chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/1828-the-river-in-reverse-looking-back-at-the-drowning-of-new-orleans.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick for Chris Floyd.


(and rec#4.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there was a way out, I would have taken it
I had never evacuated before, but I wanted to for Katrina. The state actually improved its evacuation methods during Georges a few years back with the contra-flow plan that had both sides of the Interstate going out of the city. The method was adopted by Houston, and is relatively successful. The problem is you have to have a dependable car, and gas. There was no plan to evacuate those without cars, which in New Orleans is a lot of people.

Most states have laws requiring auto insurance, which is fine, but in Louisiana the strategy was not to help people comply by regulating the insurance companies, it was simply to "get 'em off the road". The penalties were ratcheted up to the point where a single ticket for no insurance resulted in the impounding of your vehicle. The busses in the city of New Orleans were standing room only as many gave up the fight to keep a vehicle and their lisences current.

Make no mistake, there were people who chose to stay during Katrina. But to suggest that all or most of the people stranded there chose to stay is horseshit. Mayor Ray Nagin knew that a mandatory evacuation order would not in itself empty the city. His mistake was to assume that the federal government would step in because they had to, in regards to evacuation or relief supplies. I have to admit that I made this same assumption. I rode out the aftermath for 10 days before my brother-in-law picked up me and my wife, and we were among the lucky ones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Same thing with Hurricane Ike -
except the Feds had practice in New Orleans so at a certain point they just closed off Galveston Island so no one could come or go. Bolivar Peninsula, on the eastern side of Galveston, is where many of the working folks lived. It was hit hard by Hurricane Ike, and those who had not left earlier in the week (probably because they were afraid to leave their jobs early) were stuck. When 20' waves hit it wasn't hard to imagine why there weren't any people left. It was all cut off from the press - the Houston Chron couldn't even get on Galveston because the bridge was blocked. Eventually we saw news stories trickle in, especially from local rescue groups who kept databases & were instrumental in getting some of the folks identified as bodies were found. We'll never know exactly how many were lost at sea, but the general estimates were in the hundreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC