Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Disapointing Town Hall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:51 AM
Original message
Disapointing Town Hall
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 06:53 AM by AllentownJake
I really like Joe Sestak, however I watched him in his debate style town hall with Pat Toomey. Even asked a question.

Why do democrats feel the need to repeat the word capitalism and competition 50 times in a debate for the public option. People are not fucking stupid. You can not sell a government plan as capitalistic. I don't know what genius in the DNC or democratic circle thought up this line of defense. What did they think the guys calling you a socialist will suddenly stop when you drop those two words.

What they should be saying is when it has been proven that the private sector has failed government intervention is necessary. We have done this with roads, schools, and the military. Healthcare maybe a sector where some government intervention is required since the system is not serving the public good right now (another interesting concept that needs to be talked about again).

Lastly why aren't we attacking certain aspects of capitalism right now. Unbridled free market capitalism has led to 10% + unemployment, American jobs being sent to China, and people's 401(k)s halving in value. Capitalism has its place in society but it has almost become a religion not an econcomic system. Frankly our defense of our idealogically based economic system mirrors more the Soviet Union than the United States of old.

I'm not saying advocating socialism but absolutism never works.

I could be wrong Americans could really be that stupid and need to live in a black and white world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The insurance companies are protected by law from competition.

Talking about competition is STOOPID They can LEGALLY price fix.

WASHINGTON (Wednesday, March 7) – The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing, “The McCarran-Ferguson Act and Antitrust Immunity: Good for Consumers?” on Tuesday focusing on the insurance industry’s federal antitrust immunity. For more than six decades, insurance companies have enjoyed immunity from federal antitrust investigation and prosecution.

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200703/030707.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Toomey's solution
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 07:07 AM by AllentownJake
Was to allow all the blue crosses to compete with each other across borders.

It would sound great if I didn't happen to work for Lincoln Financial Group for 5 years and know that we were once also a Health Insurance Company.

Lincoln sold its health Insurance operations because they weren't profitable enough and they could not reach the economy of scale desired by management to Cigna and Cigna sold Lincoln its annuities business. They essentially just swapped products they were selling.

I'm a student of business history. The only thing that would happen with Mr. Toomey's solution is intial downward pressure on prices followed by consolidation of the blues to instead of being one state in 3.

The fundamental question is do people have a right to affordable healthcare and no market can answer that question. It is a moral question and capitalism has never been a good decider of moral questions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. So simple and succinct. Repeat, rinse, repeat.
...when it has been proven that the private sector has failed

government intervention is necessary.



A great opening for a deeper look at what's wrong with our current system of healthcare.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Problem is the noise machine has turned common sense government
intervention to us becoming a communist state.

The conservatives resemble the communist in their fear of private sector intervention with their fear of government intervention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dems are terrible at framing the debate.
We're always behind the eight ball on this. I read something, by George Lakoff I believe, that suggested that dems think that when you explain the facts to people, they will see the correctness of what you say. Repubs, however, come up with sound bites that appeal to people's emotions, facts be damned. This is a country where almost half of the voting population voted for a man who made decisions based on his gut, not on facts. It's also a country where people are spread so thin in their private lives, that they don't have time to investigate the internet for the truth. If all the info you got on health care, or any issue for that matter, was from the corporate MSM, you can see why so damned many are horribly misinformed & why emotional sound-bites work.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC