Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida banking agency helped Stanford set up unregulated office to sell his phony CDs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:23 PM
Original message
Florida banking agency helped Stanford set up unregulated office to sell his phony CDs
Lucy Komisar and her team uncover a fast-flowing money pipeline
that ran from disgraced financier Allan Stanford
right through Florida government regulators to who-knows-where?:





State aided suspect in huge swindle

Florida regulators — over objections by the state’s top banking lawyer — gave sweeping powers to banker Allen Stanford, accused of swindling investors of $7 billion.


By Lucy Komisar, Michael Sallah and Rob Barry
Miami Herald, July 5, 2009

Years before his banking empire was shut down in a massive fraud case, Allen Stanford swept into Florida with a bold plan: entice Latin Americans to pour millions into his ventures — in secrecy.

From a bayfront office in Miami in 1998, he planned to sell investments to customers and send their money to Antigua.

But to pull it off, he needed unprecedented help from an unlikely ally: The state of Florida would have to grant him the right to move vast amounts of money offshore — without reporting a penny to regulators.

He got it.

Over objections by the state’s chief banking lawyer — including concerns that Stanford was laundering money — regulators granted sweeping powers never given to a private company.

(Read the Stanford Trust Memorandum of Agreement with Florida.)

CONTINUED...

http://thekomisarscoop.com/2009/07/exclusive-florida-banking-agency-helped-stanford-set-up-unregulated-office-to-sell-his-phony-cds/



Stanford's special agreement with Florida was made in December 1998, when Florida was about to welcome a new governor, Jeb "Buy Enron" Bush.

Gee. What a small world.

I wonder what money, belonging to whom, moved to where through Florida, unnoticed and off-the-state's books?

And how does this impact the political future of Jebthro?

Any ideas, DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sweet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Allen Stanford, Friend of Bush
Smirko, too.



Allen Stanford: Friend Of Dubya

Joe Weisenthal|Feb. 17, 2009, 12:49 PM|7
The Business Insider

As some commenters have noted, it seems alleged fraudster "Sir Allen" may be the latest in a long line of inglorious Bush cronies. Stanford was fetted in 2006 by the "Inter-American Economic Council" a Latin-American business group at an event hosted buy then-President George W. Bush and his wife Laura:

One thing is sure, Stanford, both the man and his company, Stanford Financial Group, have a real and tangible commitment to giving back to the communities in which the company operates. And Stanford, the man, has approached his commitment to community investment with the same entrepreneurial spirit and intelligence that helped him build his company into the worldwide financial services organization it is today. It is for this reason that the Inter-American Economic Council (IAEC) has named Mr. Stanford the recipient of its 2006 Excellence in Leadership Award. Stanford was honored at the IAEC's Fifth Annual Winter Gala, Co-Chaired by President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush, held last night at the Hall of the Americas, Organization of American States in Washington. Over 250 business and governmental leaders from across the U.S. and Latin America attended the event.

SOURCE: http://www.businessinsider.com/allen-stanford-friend-of-dubya-2009-2



If it's not smoke, how can that fog burn up the constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh Jebbie
You has the stank of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Stanford Operation Was Ponzi Scheme From The Start, Says Number 2
It takes money to make money.



Stanford Operation Was Ponzi Scheme From The Start, Says Number 2

Zachary Roth | August 28, 2009, 12:59PM

Yesterday, we got new details on Allen Stanford's alleged $8 billion fraud, with the release of the plea deal signed by the Texas banker's number 2 man.

Jim Davis, Stanford's college roommate and the CFO of the Stanford Financial Group, pleaded guilty to conspiracy, mail fraud and obstruction charges. He told prosecutors that the company was a sham from the start, using money from new investors to pay off old ones. Davis also described how for years he helped cover up the scheme, and helped bribe a top Antiguan regulator to keep the SEC off the scent.

As the Miami Herald describes it, Davis "said that from the time he joined Stanford's Guardian International Bank in Montserrat in 1988, the operation was a fraud -- with Davis ordered to invent the numbers.

SNIP...

Indeed, in 2005, the SEC seemed onto Stanford, writing to King to urge him to disclose the bank's portfolio. But King showed the letter to Stanford, who, along with Davis, helped craft a response that succeeded in holding the regulators off. The same thing happened the next year.

CONTINUED...

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/stanford_operation_was_ponzi_scheme_from_the_start.php#more



There is a certain smell in the air: dirty money -- dirty, laundered money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Oooh! Turn on the lights!
Let us catch these bugs before they scurry away! Hand me that disinfectant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who could have guessed?
Stanford was well-connected. The boys are like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Someone said Mr. Stanford was groomed to take over BCCI Amerika.
My good friend Wayne brought this up today:

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20090903_4

Small world.

Please let me know if you can't read the article; I'll forward a copy your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Very interesting article.
They're still pirates. Who needs a ship when you can loot a country without leaving your office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh My
By the way is Stanford still in hospital; is he back in prison or has he been Ken Lay(ed)??

He was sent to the hospital for chest pains last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Two original crazy baldheads, together again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. And the lawfirm that set all this up?
From the state government document linked in the article:
http://thekomisarscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Fla-legal-memo-on-Stanford-Trust.pdf

Subject: Stanford Trust Company

... attached is the original letter dated October 12, 1998, from counsel for the trust company regarding the proposal. We advised them that this was not a routine matter and would be subject to additional review over that accorded to domestic institutions. Richard Donelan and I met with representatives of Greenberg Traurig and the trust company. At that time we were provided an analysis of the proposal by Greenberg Traurig, attached, supporting their contention that they can establish a TRO.

Don't believe for one moment that Greenberg Traurig was as clean as the driven snow until Jack Abramoff showed up in 2001. They were already up to their elbows in this sort of dirt, and that is why Jack sought them out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. And GT lists an important lawyer who set things right re BCCI...
Mr. Greg W. Kehoe spoke publicly on the subject of the government's BCCI investigation in 1991:

Why Wasn't BCCI Stopped? -- Four Theories Are Cited As Possible Reasons For Delay

There seems like there must be another reason that no one mentioned.

While he and Mr. Stanford have not crossed paths professionally, from what I can see, there are indications Mr. Stanford was to be a prince among the BCCI royalty.

Among his many accomplishments, Mr. Kehoe helped direct the prosecution of Saddam Hussein.

For those new to the subject: BCCI=Bank of Credit and Commerce International, not the governing body of cricket, with which Mr. Stanford also played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. has Carl Hiaasen written anything on this yet.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. R. Allen Stanford and Miami-based Greenberg Traurig: why is it always Greenberg Traurig?
Mr. Hiaasen does an excellent job of spelling things out.



R. Allen Stanford and Miami-based Greenberg Traurig: why is it always Greenberg Traurig?

by gimleteye
EyeOnMiami

In the 1990's, Greenberg Traurig's behind-the-scences influence as a lobbyist in Miami zoning and permitting decisions began to attract my interest. The firm, for instance, was the key organizing force for the Homestead Air Force Base fiasco. Whenever a zoning decision involving South Dade was on the county commission agenda, founding partner Bob Traurig was in the audience and frequently on behalf of converting farmland to sprawl. Environmental land use attorney, MIguel De Grandy-- formerly of Greenberg-- remains an influential player in county politics, mainly related to zoning and also an advisor to the unreformable majority of the county commission. Both Marvin Rosen and Jack Abramoff represented Greenberg Traurig, as well.

Today's Miami Herald runs an excellent story on R. Allen Stanford-- charged with multi-billion fraud-- and a new angle: the stage was set for Stanford's multi-billion fraud in 1998, the year Stanford persuaded Florida banking regulators to grant his company special rights to open a Miami office outside the scrutiny of federal banking regulators. In this unique instance, Sanford was represented by Greenberg Traurig. "There was no lawful way that office should have been opened,'' said Richard Donelan, the state's chief banking counsel who opposed the deal."

On Eyeonmiami, I've written a lot about 1998, the year Jeb Bush was elected governor of Florida. That year and that election set the stage for the the biggest boom in housing and construction in Florida history, now in ruins. Jeb won in South Florida, and primarily through the coordination of his base constituency-- builders and developers-- and as a result, Miami is the epicenter of the housing bust. This is the place the gears of the machine all lined up to mesh Wall Street financial motive with political levers at the most intricate level of decision making, from state authority to local zoning allowing unsustainable growth. The boom, based on unsustainable foundations and fraud, destroyed South Florida's quality of life and environment, minting millionaires through the reciprocal arrangements of campaign contributions and politicians. And Greenberg Traurig attorneys seem to pop up everywhere.

Stanford obtained authority to do offshore banking-- an exclusive arrangement-- with the help of Greenberg Traurig lobbyists from a Democratic administration in Tallahassee during the 1998 campaign for governor. Stanford does not begin to show up, according to a brief and cursory review of campaign contribution lists, as a prolific political donor until 2000. His contributions appear to be weighted to Democrats. Whose chains did Greenberg Traurig help to pull, during 1998, for Stanford in Tallahassee?

It is part of the story that the Herald might have considered more carefully. There was a huge amount of political pushing and pulling in 1998. Although Bill Clinton had won Florida in 1996, Lieutenant Gov. Buddy McKay, who served out the term of the late Gov. Lawton Chiles, lagged Bush badly in the polls.

"Earlier, (Stanford) went to Miami attorney Bowman Brown, who said he declined to represent Stanford. A longtime banking lawyer, Brown said there were several elements that didn't seem right about Stanford's plan. ''He wanted to set up an office in Miami to serve a business operation in the Caribbean,'' said Brown. "The idea was to attract a Latin American clientele as a platform to sell securities.'' But Brown said Stanford "was not interested in undergoing any substantive banking regulations or submitting to government examiners.''... Brown said. By the time the state approved the trust office in December 1998, Stanford was already hawking his top product: certificates of deposit."

CONTINUED...

http://eyeonmiami.blogspot.com/2009/07/r-allen-stanford-and-miami-based.html



Thanks for the heads-up, dhill926!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Greenberg, Traurig was all about Democratic corruption until 2000
Then Bush seems to have bought them off in some way connected with their participation in the Florida recount, and since it's been all GOP.

I've got a couple more things of interest on Stanford. First, another aspect of the Greenberg Traurig connection.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=a.0EEBl4oTSA&refer=us

In 1999, Stanford Financial tried to take over Antiguan International Business Corp., which regulated offshore companies on the island, said Jonathan Winer, who was then a deputy assistant secretary of State. State Department cables sent from the U.S. Embassy described a "power grab" and criticized the company's hiring of U.S. consultants to revise Antigua's offshore-banking rules. . . .

The U.S. advised financial institutions to be suspicious of transactions with Antigua banks, a warning that was lifted in August 2001 after Antigua took steps to fight money laundering. The warning didn't specifically mention Stanford Financial's bank.

Stanford Financial says Allen Stanford "was asked to serve in an advisory capacity to the government of Antigua and Barbuda" and hired a "top-notch team of former U.S. legal and regulatory professionals" that helped that country adopt anti- money-laundering rules.

That team included several lawyers from the Miami offices of Greenberg Traurig LLP, which represented Stanford Financial at the time.

A guy named Carlos Loumiet is also of interest. He's mentioned in the article cited in the OP: "Carlos Loumiet, a former Greenberg Traurig lawyer who helped draft the deal, declined to comment, citing ethical concerns."

Loumiet was in big trouble a while back in connection with Greenberg Traurig's dealings with the money-laundering Hamilton Bank:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1191967649868

October 10, 2007

An attorney for banking regulators pointed to a fax Tuesday that could prove crucial in determining whether attorney Carlos Loumiet purposely tried to protect corrupt executives at the defunct Hamilton Bank. The fax from Hamilton Bank to West Merchant Bank of London discussed the dumping of a downgraded Russian loan and the purchase of a junk Hong Kong loan at above-market prices.

Special Counsel Lee Straus, in opening statements of a civil proceeding that could bar Loumiet from representing banks, said the attorney split pages of the fax to make the transactions look separate in two reports he was producing for the Hamilton auditors. The cover sheet of the fax was also discarded.

Loumiet, who led the legal team from Greenberg Traurig dealing with the bank's outside auditor, is on trial in a case brought by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that started Tuesday in Miami before Administrative Law Judge Ann Z. Cook.

Straus has charged Loumiet -- who exclusively represents banks -- with conflict of interest, as well as suppressing evidence and causing general harm to the bank.The auditors wanted to know if Hamilton officials had illegally swapped newly downgraded Russian loans for junk Latin American and Asian debt at above-market prices to hide a $3.1 million loss.

I posted on Greenberg Traurig, Hamilton Bank, and Loumiet in a thread here last March. (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=5273942)

When Miami's Hamilton Bank collapsed in 2002 amid allegations of fraud and money-laundering, half of its accounts were taken over by Israel Discount Bank. (The never-entirely-reliable Wayne Madsen claims that Hamilton had been involved in US-Israeli intelligence and money-laundering operations, but I've never been able to confirm that elsewhere.)

In 2004, the New York City branch of Israel Discount Bank was found to have been involved in Brazilian money-laundering -- in the Triple Border region -- amounting to $2.2 billion over 5 years.

Oddly enough, both Hamilton and Israel Discount were represented by Greenberg Traurig, which wound up having to pay the FDIC $7.6 million dollars for having helped Hamilton Bank cover up loan losses related to the Russian debt crisis of 1998.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/01/03/greenberg-traurig-reaches-76-million-settlment-with-fdic

Former Greenberg Traurig attorney Carlos E. Loumiet was also charged in that Hamilton Bank case -- and Loumiet has an interesting history of association with Sir Alan Stanford. He was with Greenberg Traurig from 1988 until at least 1999, when he was described in a Washington Post story as Stanford's attorney. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/daily/oct99/banker11.htm) His name also shows up in a story from 2001, when Greenberg Traurig was representing Stanford Financial Group. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=a.0EEBl4oTSA&refer=us)

Then in 2002 he is described in a campaign donation listing as an executive with the Stanford Financial Group, and since October 2002, he's been with the lobbying firm of Hunton & Williams, where his clients still include Stanford Financial.

And Stanford own operations may have had Hamilton Bank connections. There's an article in Spanish from 2003 (http://www.laprensa.com.ni/archivo/2003/marzo/05/nacionales/nacionales-20030305-09.html -- Google translation at http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.laprensa.com.ni/archivo/2003/marzo/05/nacionales/nacionales-20030305-09.html&ei=e2qhStvdHc6f8Qanw7jTDw&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Falsificaron%2Bdocumentos%2Bpara%2Bsacar%2BUS%2524%2B2%2Bmillones%2Bde%2BIniser%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DyYz) that describes some sort of financial scam in Nicaragua where the stolen money went first through the Hamilton Bank and eventually wound up at the Stanford International Bank.

Finally, there's some good stuff on Stanford in a thread here from last February:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5135692

I've been collecting notes on Stanford -- haven't ever tried to put them all together, but it clearly goes deeper than has yet been acknowledged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. thanks for this......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC