Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fundy Pregnancy Centers Creating "Artificial Orphans": coercing young moms to give up their babies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:35 PM
Original message
Fundy Pregnancy Centers Creating "Artificial Orphans": coercing young moms to give up their babies
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 06:58 PM by Lorax7844
http://jezebel.com/5351936/crisis-pregnancy-centers-creating-artificial-orphans?skyline=true&s=x

From the article:

You know those "crisis pregnancy centers" that set up shop near abortion clinics, pretending to offer "options"? Turns out they won't just terrify you into having the baby; they'll terrify you into handing it over to them...

While waiting to give birth, Jordan was taken into the home of a "shepherding family" the agency hooked her up with, where — despite the fact she hadn't yet decided on adoption — she was referred to exclusively as a "birth mother." Says Jordan, "I felt like a walking uterus for the agency." After she settled on an adoptive couple and gave birth,

Jordan cried all day and didn't think she could relinquish the baby. She called her shepherding parents and asked if she could bring the baby home. They refused, chastising Jordan sharply. The counselor told the couple Jordan was having second thoughts and brought them, sobbing, into her recovery room. The counselor warned Jordan that if she persisted, she'd end up homeless and lose the baby anyway.

Jordan signed the adoption papers and went back to live with the shepherding family, who were "celebrating and asked why Jordan wouldn't stop crying." 5 days later she left, and when she later called the agency looking for the counseling they promised, her shepherding mother told her "You're the one who spread your legs and got pregnant out of wedlock. You have no right to grieve for this baby."...

Instead, the ones who turn to CPCs for support are abandoned the moment the umbilical cord is cut and the baby can be spirited away to some stranger's quiver. Never mind if they want the baby. Never mind if they wanted an abortion months earlier. As soon as they stumbled into a CPC, what they wanted ceased to be a factor, because CPCs are not in the business of helping pregnant women but, as Joyce says critics put it: "separat willing biological parents from their offspring, artificially producing 'orphans' for Christian parents to adopt." If you think that sounds a lot like the "Baby Scoop" era of the mid-twentieth century, when at least 1.5 million pregnant girls and women were hidden away, often in maternity homes, until they gave birth to babies they didn't dare raise in a society that wouldn't tolerate single mothers, well, you're onto something. Says Joyce of that time: "The coercion was frequently brutal, entailing severe isolation, shaming, withholding information about labor, disallowing mothers to see their babies and coercing relinquishment signatures while women were drugged or misled about their rights." In other words, pretty much what CPCs are doing now. Oh, and in case you haven't vomited yet, under the Bush administration, CPCs received over $60 million in federal funding. Have a pleasant day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those people are nothing but a bunch of sick fucks!
How dare they treat a new mom like this?

It makes me sick.


K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Trying to get more sheep to promote their bigotry.
The Born Again's are of the dirtiest POS's around.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. In the 1930's and 40's, the old fashioned way of handling this was:
the mother would give birth. Then the nurse would call the social worker over to the mother. The mother would hand the baby over to the social worker. That way, there was no coercion. The mother gave up her child.

My MIL witnessed these scenes. Many a mother was crying her eyes out and bawling as she gave her baby away. No matter what the circumstances. It is a very, very, hard thing to do to give up your child.


MIL is firmly pro-choice as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. title change and kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. One of my aunts got "in trouble" when she was barely 16 and
was spirited away to one of those homes - all the way across the country from her home, when she was barely 3 months gone. She gave the baby girl up for adoption. Married at 18, had three more daughters, and died at 36 from metastasized melanoma.

10 years ago, I got a phone call from a woman who said she thought she might be my cousin. She is - now 52 years old, married with grown children. We were happy to welcome her to the family . . . and able to do so because our grandmother (the woman who sent her daughter away to go through her pregnancy and delivery without so much as a letter) had died the year before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's ALL about the baby, the mother is disposable.
The fact that people like this exist makes me sad to be part of the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. come to think of it, once the baby's out, it can go suck a lemon, they say
(unless it's part of a Duggar-style swarm squadron for Jazus)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC