Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now we know why the Repukes fought the idea of reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:09 AM
Original message
Now we know why the Repukes fought the idea of reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.
The Repuke talking heads and political right knew that the next 4 years rested on their ability to kill any idea of reinstating the Fairness Doctrine. They succeeded, and now we are witness to why they were so vociferous in opposition. The lack of an equal coverage of counterpoint information on the health care bill has aided the Repukes in damaging any prospect of a bill and has crippled Obama.

Just imagine how differently this whole health care bill debate would be if equal time was provided to counter the corporate/mob misinformation?

REINSTATE THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE. Otherwise, the current media modus operandi (and an effective one at that) will continue to allow Repuke mob rule. The biggest mistake of the Obama Administration, IMHO.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. So did progressives like myself...
The Farness doctrine, as it used to be, was no panacea for right-wing dominance. The key to success in this is to REREGULATE media ownership - BUST the MEDIA TRUSTS!!!:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, that isn't going to happen. The Fairness Doctrine had a chance before re-regulation.
I agree with you that re-regulation would be helpful, but I just don't see that happening given the monied interests involved. At least with the Fairness Doctrine you would have near instantaneous change in how coverage of issues is provided to the masses. Most people are idiots, we all know this. People do not, typically, digest information in a critical manner. Most just believe what they see and hear. The Fairness Doctrine would at least have allowed for some osmotic information uptake on both sides of an issue.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. There WAS no fight
There was no serious debate in Congress for the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. It was killed before there even was a chance for a fight. If Obama wanted it, it could have been.
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. they keep saying it will stifle their voices
(apparently, since there are plenty of RW talkers out there who would be "forced" out of a job if it were re-instated)

but the "conservative message" is so under-represented in the media ...

boggles the mind ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There are plenty of 'corporate Dems' who don't want 'fairness'...
So, between them, and the whole Repuke party, which is 'completely owned', they would be happy without progressive ideas being discussed. The single-payer being a perfect example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, the blue dogs say it will stifle their voices, heh.
Being identical to repukes' and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's such a sad missed opportunity.
I think Murdock was worried about the prospect of re-instatement of the Fairness Doctrine, hence his cozying up to Hillary so early and then his "talks" with Obama later on.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC