Susan Ralston used Georgewbush.com Which Shares SERVER with COCKSMOKERS.ORG

I did what little research I could and not sure what to make of this. I noticed it last night while searching around and thought that was a strange name to be listed on the same servers as georgewbush.com.....

It's registered to Andy Nowakowski System Administrator for The Selekta which is apparently a hip hop site. STRANGE?

This is the link to georgewbush.com which shares server ip's with
cocksmoker.org
mailer1.gop.com
mailer2.gop.com
mailer3.gop.com
http://www.robtex.com/dns/georgewbush.com.html


This link takes you to cocksmokers.com info. which shows sharing with 2 ip servers
georgewbush.com
mailer1.gop.com
http://www.robtex.com/dns/cocksmoker.org.html

Wasn't sure why I felt the need to post other than this is a wee bit funny...


EDIT: Subject line had the wrong suffix, corrected from a .com to .org (thanks to mind your head for pointing that out)

sorry, I couldn't resist :hide:

so you're forgiven.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/1097640

Bush's republicon White House over 200 times according to official Secret Service reports?

Is that the notorious republicon male prostitute you are referring to?

I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked, shocked, shocked at the republicon depravity.

That's the one I was thinking of!

any secret portals there?

Don't you think you should be sharing this with some mainstream media types (Keith???, Ed Shultz, Randi)so the rest of the world can be educated?

and that did it. thanks!

Just thought it seemed appropriate to repost it here.

bleever :hug:

NGU :patriot:

I saw this before but it does need to be repeated.

LEst we forget about Ashcroft giving them 24 hours (at Gonzo's request) to CLEAN emails

It Appears that Ashcroft Gave the White House 24 Hours to "Clean Up" Their Files Before A Memo Was Sent to Save Documents: Who Will Investigate the Justice Department for Potentially Facilitating Obstruction of Justice?

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/10/02_ashcroft...

She stated that at the request of the White House, the DOJ deferred for 24 hours the request that all documents, email, logs be held and preserved in the investigation of the Plame outing.

NPR legal correspondent, Nina Totenberg: Well no administration ever wants an independent overseer, and there are very good career people who are in charge of this investigation, but it could get hairy. Yesterday I talked to a former justice department official who wondered to me why the White House had asked the Justice Department if they could wait a day, earlier this week, before directing the White House staff to preserve all phone and email records, and why, similarly, the Justice Department had agreed to let the White House wait that day. In the last analysis career people can't make some of the decisions that will have to be made, like whether to call a reporter before a grand jury. The Attorney General under Justice (Department) regulations is required to make that decision. A career person can't make it. And if a leaker is identified and not prosecuted it could raise problems with the CIA. Will the agency believe that a decision not to prosecute was made fairly, or will it, as one former Justice Department
official put it to me, open a chasm of distrust between the two agencies. As I said no administration likes to open itself up to outside investigators. And the temperature isn't that hot yet, despite that poll you cited at the beginning, but it could get that hot, and we just can't know right now whether the temperature will get that hot for a long time and make it impossible to continue the course that the administration now has chosen
to take.

Many major media outlets continue to ignore story of missing White House emails
Tue, Feb 7, 2006 12:33pm EST
http://mediamatters.org/items/200602070004

Last week, Media Matters for America documented how most media outlets failed to report that special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the lead prosecutor in the CIA leak case, wrote -- in a letter to defense attorneys for former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby -- that numerous White House emails from 2003 are missing from White House computer archives. A further review by Media Matters has found that most major media outlets have continued to ignore this story; specifically, no reports on the missing emails have been found on any of the three major broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, and CBS), The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, or the Reuters wire service.

:toast:

it only gets better with age. :)

merh: ((((:hug:))))

I just made that up, I think, it sounds go though, doesn't it. :P

bleever, my most favorite believer :hug:

N.G.U. :patriot:

I still believe.

:hi:

N.G.U. :patriot:

:hug: :loveya:

How's by you? Life getting a bit easier? I hope so. :hug:

NGU! :loveya:

Look Up Cocksmoker.org and I started laughing...

Notice it is an organization... What is their mandate I wonder? :shrug:

:shrug:

But they would love to send the fat, freaky nose of BushCo-brand-Republicon Big Government snooping in everybody else's closets and bedrooms.

Why do republicons support Big Government sticking its fat nose into people's private lives?

Why?

just an interestin coincidink.

I KNEW the wallpaper industry were Bushco shills!

route 209.61.128.0/18 Rackspace com, 112 E Pecan St , Suite 600, San Antonio, TX 78205

delete

A huge hosting provider. Big colocation facility.

I prefer smoked turkey or salmon.

n/t

Registrant:
Bush-Cheney '04, Inc.
P.O. Box 10648
Arlington, VA 22210
US

Domain Name: GEORGEWBUSH.COM

Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Bush-Cheney '04, Inc. Chuck@georgewbush.com
P.O. Box 10648
Arlington, VA 22210
US
703-647-2700


Record expires on 06-May-2008.
Record created on 05-May-1997.
Database last updated on 22-Mar-2007 04:42:19 EDT.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS1.CHA.SMARTECHCORP.NET
A.NS.TRESPASSERS-W.NET

http://www.robtex.com/whois/georgewbush.com.html

Bush Cheney 04 Incorporated
2107 Wilson Blvd

Arlington, VA 22201-3091

(703) 647-2700

All of you tech people out there, does this mean anything significant? Did someone change something recently? When I go to www.cocksmokers.ORG it says this:

If you can see this, it means that the installation of the Apache web server software on this system was successful. You may now add content to this directory and replace this page.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seeing this instead of the website you expected?
This page is here because the site administrator has changed the configuration of this web server. Please contact the person responsible for maintaining this server with questions. The Apache Software Foundation, which wrote the web server software this site administrator is using, has nothing to do with maintaining this site and cannot help resolve configuration issues.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Apache documentation has been included with this distribution.

You are free to use the image below on an Apache-powered web server. Thanks for using Apache!

such as a lot of these accounts have been modified within the last few weeks. What do you think that is about:shrug:


EXAMPLE:
Domain Name: GEORGEWBUSH.COM
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: A.NS.TRESPASSERS-W.NET
Name Server: NS1.CHA.SMARTECHCORP.NET
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 27-jun-2006
Creation Date: 05-may-1997
Expiration Date: 06-may-2008

>>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:47:36 UTC <<<

Thanks for pointing out my error, I corrected it....

but I don't know what it means. IT stuff is not one of my strong points. Anyone out there that can explain what, if anything, this stuff might mean?

The whois update date-stamp is for the DNS database and not a change in registration values.

But cocksmokers.org.. :rofl: :wtf:

the same rules as an IP server on State property? Just thinking about how they might have used stuff for themselves to get around Congress - considering the players involved in today's talk and the way they link - Ralston-Rove, Ralston-Abramoff, Rove-Abramoff, Abramoff-Indian casinos on reservations - i.e., exceptions that might equate to an IP located in Canada and not subject to Congressional area of investigation? Only thinking and not qualified to think based on deficiency of knowledge, but doing it anyway.

...as long as the servers are accessed through outside networks, there would be no extra protection. If the servers were only being accessed from within the Reservation, perhaps. Once they open themselves up to commercial traffic from outside their intra net, I would think they are considered the same as any other server on US property. dunno though

...although hosting with a "smaller" web hosting company for my own site, I know that hundreds of thousands of virtual domains can be hosted even by "smaller" servers.

:kick:

I can guarantee you we have NO IDEA what is really going on behind the BFEEs closed doors.

How he would know should be the real question.